חדשות וירוס TV - מהדורה 961 • הנחיה מאלפת - חלק ב' • 16-05-2024
\n
- - - לא מוגה! - - -
\n
אם אתה תראה את ההצעה הפיננציאלית, החברה עם גייטס,
כשהיא התקבלה,
אתה מתחיל את האנומליה.
היום היה ש-UN אסוציאטד אורגניזציה, ובספציפית, האורגנציה המשפטית,
היו שני איתמות של הכבודות.
הכבוד אורגניזציה כמו המשפטת המשפטית או עבור בוועדת איתמות,
הוא ידלוק את מלא למוד ה-OECD,
אז יש הקורפורציה של הקורפורציה, הכנסת המשפטית, ויש עוד אחרות שבאותו.
אבל
עם הקורפים של הכבוד, רוקאפלר פונדציה והגייטס פונדציה,
והחברי הקורפים הקטנים, כמו הפונדציה הבלומברג וכמה אחרים עכשיו, אבל במיוחד של הכבוד,
סודאי אנחנו בעצם נותנים במה שאנחנו קוראים הגלובל פרופנציה לבורד.
אבל מי עומד על זה?
דוקר אליאס מהגייטס פונדציה,
אנתוני פאוצ'י מה-NIID, ג'רמי פארר מה-Welcome Trust. זאת אומרת,
זו קרימינל קונספירציה,
ואני לא אומר את זה מצוות של תיאורי קונספירציה,
אני אומר את זה מצוות מה שזה אומר קונספירציה קונספירציה.
אז אם אתה שואל את השאלה, זו משהו לגיטימטי,
האם ה-FDA, האם ה-CDC, אם ה-OECD,
התשובה היא כמעט כמעט.
אבל מי הם באמת אם ה-OECD?
וזו שאלות לגבי ההלימודות.
התשובה הוא שהתשובה הזאת זו קדימה קונספירציה,
זו השתלתי של החלטה,
זו קומותית,
לא משיחה שעומדות, לא,
אתה יודע, אנחנו חולקים של השידה של האמונות.
זו קונספירציה קונספירציה,
שהוא זכאי בתי YH
of actually suppressing commercial alternatives, which is called market allocation,
another felony.
That criminal organization announced that it was going to take over the world,
and they did.
But we have to name the names.
It wasn't just the World Health Organization.
Anybody think that Tadros is smart enough to pull this off?
He's delusional.
He's a puppet.
And there's a giant stick up his ass, which is what's making his mouth move.
But who's moving the stick for the puppet?
And that is, Welcome,
Gates and Rockefeller.
ב-2023,
which is kind of where we are right now,
Gates represents 88% of the donation to the World Health Organization from donor organizations and agencies.
By any definition, that's a controlling interest.
So is it independent?
No.
Is it the World Health Organization non-profit in Switzerland?
No.
This even violates Swiss law.
Everything I'm saying is a violation of Swiss law.
If we think about how bizarre it is that we have the,
essentially, the extension of the קאניגי Foundation's eugenics office,
which they put it to the Kultzfing Harbor Labs back in the early 1900s.
The continuation of that with the explicit inclusion of that as an agenda in the 1950s,
when the World Health Organization gets off the ground.
The ongoing nature of Bill Gates getting up and talking about how there's too many people on the earth,
ובלומברג and others getting up and saying we need to figure out how to control populations.
In 2011, when we had the decade of the vaccines,
the publication come out of the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board,
we had a very explicit statement that said that if we have vaccinations where we need them,
we will actually see,
potentially as much as a 20% reduction in the population on earth.
אלה לא העלגיונות, אלה מבטיחות.
אבל אם נסתכלים ולראות ולראות מה שיש בזה,
מה שאתם רואים את זה,
שכל דבר ראווח לימודים במסגרת ההיסטוריה שאנשים לא
באמת לא יודעים את זה בכלל, וזה 1944. 1944,
בקונפרנסת ברטון-וודס,
שבניהם לא אנומלית, אבל אני רוצה להשתמש בזה בגלל זה, כי זה הכול גדול של האבט שאנחנו יש
על ארץ.
אז בואו נשאיר את זה ונעשה את זה.
כשאנחנו באמת רואים את הקונפרנסת ברטון-וודס ב-1944,
מה שאנחנו רואים היום שקבוצה אחרת של אזרחי אלייס,
שעברו יחדו לפני קצת המחנה האחרונה
ובאו עם פרוגמה
הזו, והפרוגמה הייתה,
אנחנו הולכים להגיד שאנחנו נצטרך את העבודה,
שבשבילה,
ב-1944,
לא הייתה הבנת הקונקציה.
אנחנו לא ידענו שאנחנו הולכים לצטרך את העבודה ב-1944,
והאלייס אמור היה כל רגע להאמין שאולי זה לא יעלה את הדרך הללו, אבל
היה שהאגרימה הזאת,
אם נשאר,
אז אנחנו נקריא את הפרוגמה המולטילטרלית,
שמה?
ההסתכלות של ה-Motterary Fund, ההסתכלות של מה שקיים את המדינות הברות, ההסתכלות של מה שהיה לגבי ה-League of Nations,
ההסתכלות של כל הפרוגיות המולטילטרליות,
ועם איזו פרוגמה שכל כך,
וזה כך קריטי להבין,
הם הלכו להכניס מבחינות עצמם.
לא כאילו כמבחינות דיפלומטית,
כאילו
אמונות עצמכות של כל קריטה שהם יעשו לעשות מבחינות עצמם.
ואם אתה הולך ומבחינות את הצארטר,
אתה הולך ללכת וכאילו
ללכת
קצת עצמם.
אי-אף אחד בכל זמן לא מביך להגיד,
under what authority does a group of 120 people on earth have to just make their own laws
and then have them stick?
think of how ridiculous that is.
But then also think about why is it that we're not doing the same thing?
Why don't we have a Breton woods of responsible humans?
Why don't we actually do what that same group did?
Why don't we have the audacity of sitting down and going, well,
what's the precedent?
I don't know, the World Bank, the IMF,
the World Trade Organization, the United Nations,
why don't we actually do it?
It never was authorized.
There was never permission granted to absolve yourself of criminal liability,
they just gave it to themselves.
And I would encourage people who are actually listening and thinking about this particular conversation,
to go back and read the final presentation of Morgנתאו at Breton Woods.
Because if you go back and read it, you'll go,
That's just a dude.
He wasn't elected,
he wasn't,
you know, he didn't have any legislative or judicial or executive authority, he just was a dude.
And he just said,
I'm going to take over the world.
And we let him take over the world.
And then, as now,
it was actually the Rockefeller Foundation and the Welcome Trust.
And at the time, those were the two biggest checkwriters. And then after that, we had a bunch of other multilateral donors. But the big ones,
I mean, Ford was very involved,
other big corporations were very involved at the time, but it was just
company sponsored.
So we could actually have אילן מוסקו.
היי, guess what?
Breton was 2.0, let's do it.
And it would be that ludicrous.
Klaus Schwab is the same thing.
most people don't remember that the World Economic Forum almost went bankrupt.
And but for some economic support,
he largely provided by a guy in Melbourne,
Australia,
which has an interesting link to the Draconian lockdown in Victoria, in Australia,
and the horse-טרמפלגות של אנשים,
and the,
you know,
people getting draggeded out of their homes for their Facebook posts and everything else.
That melbourne, that Victoria,
the guy who actually kept Klaus Schwab alive when W.E.F.
was almost going out of the business
was in Australia.
Very few people actually know that.
But we should.
And we should talk about that. We should talk about why W.E.F.
was allowed to continue to exist at the time when Klaus Schwab had steer it right into the iceberg.
And then we should ask, well,
why was it
kept alive?
And what is it really?
Not unlike the Gates Foundation.
There's a story behind the story.
W.E.F. is a marketing arm of stupidity
to see how many things you can say.
כמו יובל הררי
אומרים שאנחנו לא צריכים לרדת הפרדוקציה אחרי 2030.
ומה שקורה
זה שהם אומרים דברים רעיוניים,
ואז אנשים נהרגשים לרדת פרנזי ולומרים שיש לנו 50 מדינות,
אנחנו נהרגשים לקרנציה דיגיטלית, אנחנו נהרגשים לזה, אנחנו נהרגשים לזה, אנחנו נהרגשים לזה.
ואי-אף אחד לא יסתם ואומרים,
תקשיבו,
תקשיבו,
למה לא נהרגשו,
לא לדבר שלכם יקשיבו.
כי אנחנו יכולים.
אם אנחנו אומרים,
אין טעם רגע ליבל.
בעצם,
השטג סיילנס יובל,
השטג סיילנס קלאוס,
נכון?
איפה זה?
מה אם אנחנו באמת
לא נשארים את המשך שלהם כלום?
אז הם באמת יקשיבו על הארץ בקריאה כזו,
כמו האבודנטי,
הלא-אנשים שהם,
והם מינים,
שהם עובדים בין האורגניזציהם,
יכלו יגידו,
אתה יודע מה, דאבו...
It's really isn't fun anymore, and they'd stop going.
We're the problem.
And if we took their voice away,
they would have no voice.
And this is the part that gets really uncomfortable,
because too many people
tell me,
Oh, but they're all powerful.
No,
you're giving them power.
It is easy for me to listen to יובל הררי and not share the stupidity
of a sociopath.
It's easy to do that.
Just like I would have no problem not sharing something that Bill Gates said.
Just like I have no problem not sharing something as stupid as anything that comes out of the mouth of Joe Biden.
I don't have a need to share it.
And I think we do ourselves a great favor if we backed off of our promotion of their message and just said why don't we actually,
I don't know,
share messages that
maybe are encouraging of humanity, maybe they are positive,
maybe they are calls to action, maybe they are things that you can do something about rather than going,
look how dark the darkness is getting.
If we actually keep those conversations going,
guess who wins?
The darkness.
We're the problem.
Because if we are being pumped through the mainstream media,
a story that says it's the border wall today,
it's the target store closing in Philadelphia tomorrow.
Every time we jump for another one of these nonsensical cover stories,
we are actually ignoring the fact that this is organized crime.
And we need to start being the solution.
We need to start having conversations about the fact that humans
take a stand and rising up and saying no.
And remember,
within the last two months,
one of the largest healthcare consortiaות in Califורניה
ראיתם את המנהיגות המנהיגות המנהיגות, ואתה יודע מה קרה?
It lasted 48 חודש.
כי המחלקים אמרו לא.
40,000 אנשים אמרו לא.
ופתאום,
המנהיגות המנהיגות המנהיגות.
אנחנו צריכים לדבר על ההיסטוריה הזאת.
והם היו חברי חברי הכנסת
שאומרים,
נא,
אני לא מנסה במה הזאת.
יש שתי תשובות למה אנחנו נהיה בוודאי לתת אמה.
The first answer is, I think, non-compliance, because ultimately
there will be cases
where people are actually held to some sort of judicial review.
We, by the way, saw this already in several states, where doctors who lost their licenses because they advocated for certain treatments are now having the medical boards having to eat crow
and they're now getting their licenses reinstated.
And those doctors,
I applaud because they stayed true to themself,
and they said I'm not going to fall for it,
and they suffered and they are now getting certain restitution.
The cool thing is
those cases are an indicative
element of where the future might go.
Because at some point in time
there will be a discovery
in which somebody is accused of a thing,
making a false statement,
criticizing a certain organization and there will be a liable charger, there will be something and inside of it there's going to be a discovery.
And most people don't understand how the law works, but what we need is, we need a couple cases
that actually are going to feel very uncomfortable in the moment.
But when an allegation is made that you said something that was false,
guess what?
They have to prove it was true, you don't.
And it would be really,
really fun right now
to actually have a few of those cases.
where you get to deptose,
Anthony Fauci, you get to get access to un-redacted emails,
you get access to what civil procedure gives you and before long what you get is the evidence of the crime.
What we did in Utah is actually a ground-breaking story and the story isn't over.
It feels over to the casual observer, but it is not over.
We allegedly lost the case and technically,
anybody reviewing the federal case will say it was dismissed under the grounds of rightness
because our plaintiff,
Deven Greer, who was an amazingly courageous position in Utah,
who actually took the first federal case,
he put himself up there,
the first guy to paint the target on his back.
The court held that since he was not fired,
he was threatened to be fired,
but he was not fired for not getting a job,
because he did not actually have the firing happen,
the court case couldn't move forward.
Now,
we argued that the threat of firing was coercion,
but the judge said no,
he needed to be fired to have the standing to bring the case.
That's true and we lost but we didn't because it turns out that in the state of Utah
there is a law that says that there is a thing called the illegal practice of medicine,
which is actually to make medical recommendations and to give medical guidance
as an entity that is not license to practice medicine in the state.
That is a class three felony.
And in the state of Utah as a class three felony that practicing of medicine without a license
is not limited to doctors who are actually practicing in Utah.
And the federal government in its own defense in our federal case,
admitted to the practice of medicine in Utah without a license.
Under the state statute in Utah it says the attorney general
shall prosecuted that class 3. Not may,
של.
It does not give the attorney general any discretion.
The law says that crime has to be prosecuted.
Now,
שון רייז,
current attorney general in Utah,
has, because of his moral and ethical compromise, been unwilling to take that case.
That's fine,
but guess what?
He won't be attorney general forever.
And that crime doesn't go away.
And we have, because of the case we filed a felony
case against the U.S. government
for the illegal practice of medicine in the state of Utah.
Now,
how would they defend themselves?
Well, they'd have to actually produce evidence
that they somehow had the basis for making the recommendations they did.
They would have to have the evidence that they actually had
data that's legal data backing up the support for it because all of that is required under the statute.
And none of that exist.
So the crimes are already there and the prosecution pathway is already there and those are going to be the cases where we have to take a step back and realize and I like to use historical metaphors.
1774 is when we started the revolution
and we didn't finish the fight the first time around
until the 1780's.
And we didn't really finish the conflict
until the treaty of Gant after the war of 1812.
So let's just do the little math on where we are versus where independence was.
1774 to 1815. Last time I check
that's a generation
that took us to just to declare independence.
We're three years into this fight.
We're not 30 years into it yet.
So the way I look at it,
we're on track.
We actually have some wins on the board and we have some contingency wins on the board.
And I'm super excited about the fact that we're ahead of the founding fathers of this country.
My ability to conduct my life
should be an absolute authority at liberty provided
that the exercise of my liberty does not impair your's.
Because for a functional society to work,
we have to have absolute liberty within the boundaries of not impairing someone else's ability to access the same thing. That's what community is.
And that's the definition of liberty that Thomas Jefferson has espoused.
That's the definition of liberty that goes back to the code of
what we're talking about it as true. Because then, what does that imply? That implies not only do I have a self-respect
to honor my essence,
אבל I also have an obligation to understand your's.
To make sure that my exercise of liberty doesn't impinge on your's,
וכו' וכו'.
זאת אומרת, אנחנו צריכים לדבר,
אנחנו צריכים להשתמשך,
אנחנו צריכים להשתמשך בנושא דיאלוג, אנחנו צריכים לעשות כמה דברים,
וזו האמת
שהיא מתחילה מכל הקשורים שלנו,
וזו האמת שאנחנו צריכים להשתמשך.
אז ההתשובה היא באמת ספציה.
אתה לא יכול לנסות ממני את מה שאני לא לוקח.
האם אני ריסק כלום?
לא.
אני בעצם עושה את הכי טוב שאני יכול עם מה שאני לוקח.
אני לא לוקח להשתמשך,
אז אני לא יכול לברך להשתמשות ואני לא יכול לעשות כמה דברים אחרים.
My message has landed in every country on earth.
I haven't had the pain to push that out.
I've lived a life so far beyond my wildest expectations and dreams.
I've had experiences that I could not have imagined times of thousand
because the fact is that I have lived fully and I've done everything I can to the best of my abilities.
I'm going to go to bring every drop out of this rag.
פריקינג let nothing remain, because I want to know that I was fully spent on the day that I'm done.
![מחרוזת שירי קפ"ז | הרב אמנון יצחק [שיר]](https://shofar.tv/storage/thumb/videos/V014860_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2024]](/storage/thumb/videos/V018106_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2023]](/storage/thumb/videos/V017157_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2020] - עם כתוביות באנגלית](/storage/thumb/videos/V016615_150.jpg)
![חוזרים בעבר - מיקס - חלק 2 [3:30 שעות!]](/storage/thumb/videos/V015619_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2022] 3 שעות!](/storage/thumb/videos/V015525_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2021] - עם כתוביות באנגלית](/storage/thumb/videos/V014960_150.jpg)
![הכל יודוך | הרב אמנון יצחק [שיר]](/storage/thumb/videos/V015560_150.jpg)
![ושמחת בימיך | הרב אמנון יצחק [שיר]](/storage/thumb/videos/V015558_150.jpg)
![מחרוזת שירי קפ"ז | הרב אמנון יצחק [שיר]](/storage/thumb/videos/V014860_150.jpg)
![[שיר] נאד נפוח • ביצוע: הרב אמנון יצחק](/storage/thumb/videos/V014415_150.jpg)
