חדשות וירוס TV - מהדורה 960 • הנחיה מאלפת - חלק א' • 15-05-2024
\n
- - - לא מוגה! - - -
\n
ואני חושב שכמדינת ישראל היו מנהיגים להחליט את הנרטיבה הבאה בלי שאלה.
As I will,
and I'm dating myself,
you'll recall when we were told that we should crawl under school desks in elementary school and hide under our desks
in the event of a nuclear attack from Russia.
Now, you'll remember those desks,
they had a wooden top,
they had a little metal casement and then four metal stands.
And somehow, as children, we were conditioned to say that in the event of a nuclear blast we were going to somehow be saved under our desks.
Really?
Does anybody know anything about radiation?
Does anybody know anything about how nuclear weapons work?
Because hiding under a desk merely means that your corpse is preserved so when the
Pompey digers come back to dig you up, they'll find nice little encapsulated children huddled under melted metal desks.
It'll be phenomenal and it'll be great for a museum somewhere.
What a non-sensical thing to do,
but why did that practice become ubiquitous across the country?
It was to instill fear that allows you to respond to an authoritative impulse.
And I can guarantee you
every single person who is a parent over the age of 40
knows that they were conditioned to accept,
be afraid,
set any logic aside,
and if the authority tells you to do it in fear, do it.
And by the way,
if you were like me,
being a little smart ass, because I was in elementary school,
when you pointed out how stupid that was,
you know what you got?
send it to the principles of the office.
see, this programming this has been around for a long time and we pretend like it's, Oh my gosh, how did this happen in 2019?
No, come on.
We have been הביטוויידed into the belief that if the people and authority who architect the fear tell you, A, to be afraid and then B, what to do when you're afraid,
then you do it.
And if we, and if we, as a society, stopped living in the fear narrative, the signal couldn't transmit.
I made a commitment at the very beginning of this to stay within
the four walls of the four walls of the law, as we have them today.
I've only asked for the laws to be upheld.
אם we have laws,
אם we have what we call fair play,
then let's actually play by the rules.
The courts across the board
made an unambiguous declaration that we were in a public health emergency,
and that the World Health Organization and the CDC were the only arbiters of what
the facts were and so you could not argue the facts.
Gates represents 88% of the donation to the World Health Organization from donor organizations and agencies.
By any definition,
that's a controlling interest.
They had no problem going after osteopaths and kירופרטים
and people who were advocating for zinc or hydraxי קלורגמן,
and they were shutting people down, they were taking people's licenses.
So the Deceptive Medical Practices law was very much in play.
We will cite you,
and if we need to,
we will arrest you and we will take you to jail.
So I think we're going to get different pathogens.
We already see the NIFA craze that was going on in India,
and we've got a bunch of other toxins that are being discussed.
Apocalipses have been overrated every time they've been promoted.
And by the way, Human History is filled with Apocalypse forecasts,
and they all suck.
We forget that we have a conscious role to play in this.
And if we give the frequency of evil the carrier frequency of the carrier frequency on which it can transmit,
yes, what will be transmitted?
Evil.
We have done a terrible job as humanity in learning how to grieve,
and even a worse job in understanding how to grieve
for people who have been cruel to us.
I had a very particularly interesting experience because in my family I have not only several public health
very senior people, my oldest brother works at CDC and was one of the celebrated members of the Eבולה team that went to,
you know, Africa.
And what I found was that obviously I was on the wrong side of their existential view of things.
And my very outspoken position had led to an increased distance of an already broken family.
So I had a personal narrative, which was I was trying to always be respectful of people that I do actually have a level of affection
for even though, even though our lives have gone very different directions.
And I tried to always measure how I spoke in a way that said if my brother at CDC listen to what I said,
I know he would vigorously disagree with me,
but I wonder if he could hear in my voice a fundamental respect for humanity that says we can have honest discourse,
we can have honest disagreement and we can still arrive at a human response at the end.
And for me, up until the rollout of the injection that felt like a possible,
potentially attainable goal.
But when people were coerced,
manipulated and lied to to first get themself injected and then have you can't come to the family reunion,
you can't come to a wedding, you can't come to a school,
you can't come to a whatever,
unless you have evidence of an injection.
When coercion, when coercion became part of the narrative I lost my capacity to hold that equanimity because this went from an honest disagreement to murder and I had to do everything I could and I still do to restrain myself from the recognition
that I had spent a year and a half before all this started
public publicly trying to pump the brakes on the rollout of what was going to ultimately kill human beings.
And I was not only ridiculed for the positions that I took,
but I lost an enormous amount of both business and social interactions because of it.
So for me, it was a deeply personal thing.
This was one of those things where I indicted my own performance
for having failed to alert people at a level that would have gotten them to stop it before it happened.
And so if I were to say that I had a dark night of the soul moment
I would say that early early in 2021, going into the middle of 2021,
I was pretty upset
that somehow or another there was an inadequacy in what I communicated or how I communicated it
and I started doing a real deep examination of what had I done wrong.
Because I actually wanted to do something in a clear and compelling enough way
whether it was פלנדמק with מיקי וויליס,
whether it was the butterfly of the week,
which is the show that Kim and I did, whether it was theactivate humanity platform that I also did.
I wanted somehow to communicate to enough people.
Don't fall for it.
Don't let your family get injured by it. Don't let your kids get injured by it. Don't let all of these things happen.
And tragically,
I found that there was no one,
לא על הליברתי-סיד,
לא על הליברתי-חברת הישראלית של האופוזיציה הישראלית,
ומיוחד שאיש מישהו על האחרון מי היה יכול לעשות אפילו להקבל את הדיאלוג
ואומר להם, היי, לא צריך להגזים את זה.
וכך, מה שהיה נראה לי קשור לעצמי זה שהמשך של 2021,
אני חשבתי על התוכניות שלי כחלק מהחלטה.
וזה מאוד אגואי, פרסונל,
רק,
אתה יודע,
רפלקטיבו,
שאני יושב בו ואומר,
אני לא מצליח לעשות את מה שאני רוצה לעשות.
And across 2021,
I worked very hard to see if I could do something to change that trajectory for myself.
And so I laid out a series of legal arguments that ultimately were embraced by a group of attorneys in Idaho and in Louisiana,
which gave rise to the first
filing that ever was done to try to block the CMS mandate,
the medical mandate that was associated with the injections.
And throughout the
In the back end of 2021, going into the spring of 2022,
I actually worked to prepare and ultimately filed the first case in federal court
about the illegality of the coercive mandate on the healthcare providers.
The equal opportunity of the commission's opinion
that said that employers were authorized to infect co-ers employees to do things
is exactly the same thing that happened in 1920 when the Nazi
party decided that it was employers who had to implement their programs because they knew in Germany at the time,
the rules that they were making were actually illegal in Germany,
but they could enforce it through organized labor and employment law.
And so, the methodology, by the way, if you go back and look at the 1947 transcripts and the Nuremberg trials,
this is ripped right out of the pages.
I mean, it is unambiguous that this was a plan program that said, we know what we're doing is a violation
of the constitution of the rights and the constitution of the law, but we're going to allow employers to be the implementation arm,
which is the book end to the defense department's rollout.
Because remember, ATI and Aanser,
the companies that got the Operation Warp Speed
– which by the way
had to get independent Jag review, not once, but twice,
to make sure that if the Department of Defense was the agency through which all these things rolled out,
that there wouldn't ultimately be a liability that would flow back up to the defense department.
And those Jag reviews are a matter of public record,
which was in fact that at the time,
U.S. ATרניב, ג'נרל ויליאם בר,
kicking the can over to the Department of Defense.
The Jag attorneys reviewing on behalf of the Department of Defense a double opinion
that allowed ATI,
as a contractinging entity,
to essentially get a hard pass on any liability ultimately back
to the Department of Defense.
If we look at these as bookends,
you have the DOD on the one hand as the agent of distribution and you have employers as the means by which that distribution happens,
it's not surprising at all that the effectiveness was absolute
because now you have a military op on one side
and you have an authorized liability-proven
distribution agency on the other side.
It was brilliantly executed,
but it was absolutely criminal.
So while the rest of what I'm going to call the liberty movement moved down the pathway of speaking about the violations of individual liberties and the violation of basic health provisions and the violation of the patient-doctor relationship and all the things which
are actually correct in terms of the assessment of there was something wrong there,
I decided to swing the pendulum even further towards I'm going to stay
absolutely laser laser-to-labeled.
And as I said in numerous interviews and as I continue to say,
we have to go back to 1913 to understand this crime.
And specifically, what we have to do is we have to look at the Rockefeller Foundation and then a few years later the Welcome Trust,
which became the colluding parties
that authorized the idea of allopathic medicine becoming the agency through which
behavior modification we have done through medicine.
Remember that the Flexner report came out and it basically said that if you had another way of healing other than the industrial pharmaceutical way of healing,
it was going to be deemed קוואקרי and we were going to throw it out the window.
shortly thereafter, you had the Welcome trust being set up and if you look at the welcome trust going into the second world war,
it was very explicitly the commercial offense
של אשרד אל תקשורת טובים ועימי הכל משמעותית הברסות מהערכת הבניין... בסדר.
כל הניסיון שזה כך שאם אנשים רוצים לחשוב, הם יכולים לחשוב ולראות לראות על מלעונות מלחמת פלנסים הסרטיים,
לא מצטעים,
מהמלחמת פלנסים מישראלים ביחדות לרשימות מלחמת פלנסי המשמעותיות של גרמי.
כלומר שאני אומר שזו תושבת, אני לא מדבר על זה,
יש בעצם תוכניות ארכיבות שיאמרו שהם היו פלאנים לגבי איך לקחת את כלורקוויאנס וכלורקוויאנס וכלורקוויאנס וכל מיני דרוגים למלאריה,
אספרינס,
כל מיני דברים,
וזה נכון לראות את זה.
ברור שהקוקאן,
אחד מהחלקים מאוד מאוד של פרמקופיה שלו,
שהייתה חלק גדולה של הפרמסקולן בגלל הפרמסקולן
ובאחורי ה-20s ובאחורי ה-30s.
וכך, אם לא נעשה זמן, אנחנו באמת נמצאים את השאלה
שהפורמת רוקאפלר והביטחון והביטחון החברה היו האנטיברית,
שבאופן מ-1947 הוצאה את ה-World Health Organization על המטה.
אבל מה שמאוד מעניין בזה
הוא שבשלילה של האורגנציה ה-UN-אפילייטד של האורגנציה ה-World Health Organization,
הם כתבי בצרילה את
האבסולות
liability shield from all criminal prosecution, in perpetuity,
for any person associated with the World Health Organization and any of its activities.
where it quite specifically goes down to the level of saying, you cannot be prosecuted for any crime of any manner in any way
as long as you do it under the umbrella of the World Health Organization.
It's important to realize that when we talk about the World Health Organization,
we're not talking about an institution in the United Nations,
we're talking about a criminal conspiracy that was put in place
by two foundations
who had a commercial interest in building a criminal liability shield for themself.
That's what it is.
It never was a health organization, it was a criminal organization.
And by criminal, I literally mean that under the Clayton Act in the United States,
and under the Sherman Act in the United States,
and under the Competentימות של החברה של אירופה.
What they did was a crime.
They colluded, they price fixed, they did all of the things which were anti-trust violations,
but put it under the umbrella of public health and everybody's supposed to go, Oh,
they're doing it for the good of humanity.
Except when you look at the actual financial statements של World Health Organization,
you find out that by 1950,
and then again, ב-1955,
the singular focus of the World Health Organization was,
are you ready for this?
Vaccine promotion.
We have the director general of the World Health Organization,
going one step further and saying,
and I'm quoting,
this is about population control.
Now,
מה does that mean?
That means that when we're taking orders from the World Health Organization,
we're not.
And fast forward to the Gates Foundation, which
most people don't realize
was an undesclosed settlement between the U.S. Departement of Justice and the Gates convicted,
felony, anti-trust violations,
right? This was not,
there was an allegation, Microsoft did bad things.
This is a,
they were convicted of anti-trust crimes.
Quite mysteriously, the Gates Foundation just shows up and instantaneously
starts laundering money into, are you ready for this?
The World Health Organization.
תודה רבה.
![מחרוזת שירי קפ"ז | הרב אמנון יצחק [שיר]](https://shofar.tv/storage/thumb/videos/V014860_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2024]](/storage/thumb/videos/V018106_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2023]](/storage/thumb/videos/V017157_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2020] - עם כתוביות באנגלית](/storage/thumb/videos/V016615_150.jpg)
![חוזרים בעבר - מיקס - חלק 2 [3:30 שעות!]](/storage/thumb/videos/V015619_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2022] 3 שעות!](/storage/thumb/videos/V015525_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2021] - עם כתוביות באנגלית](/storage/thumb/videos/V014960_150.jpg)
![הכל יודוך | הרב אמנון יצחק [שיר]](/storage/thumb/videos/V015560_150.jpg)
![ושמחת בימיך | הרב אמנון יצחק [שיר]](/storage/thumb/videos/V015558_150.jpg)
![מחרוזת שירי קפ"ז | הרב אמנון יצחק [שיר]](/storage/thumb/videos/V014860_150.jpg)
![[שיר] נאד נפוח • ביצוע: הרב אמנון יצחק](/storage/thumb/videos/V014415_150.jpg)
