חדשות וירוס TV - מהדורה 906 • ירחירייה • 15-02-2024
- - - לא מוגה! - - -
And an array of unconvention20, privately funded plans to exploit the moon,
including as a site for human ashes and sports drink containers, has gathered steam in recent years as NASA pushes to make earth's natural satellite more accessible.
תיקו, תשואל את ההתלגה הזאת.
There's a new legal debate about the moon that started with human ashes and a can of Pocari sweat.
They were among the items on a recent private moon mission by U.S. company אסטרו-בודיק,
which ultimately failed to reach the moon's surface.
What they were planning to do with the Japanese sports strength is unclear,
but the trip had raised legal concerns about the proper use of the moon,
amid an array of unconvention,
all privately funded plans to exploit it.
No one country has jurisdiction over it,
so how should it be governed?
Right now,
there are no U.S. laws or standards outlining what's acceptable on the moon's surface.
That's an issue that'll gain more attention,
as NASA increasingly leans on private companies to cut the costs of its trips to the moon.
NASA says it has no control over what private companies put in their landers,
but says payload standards could be created in the future.
Lawyers with space law expertise worry that the absence of regulations will not only make the moon a target for contamination and litter,
but also spark international disputes.
Few countries have adopted standards for moon behavior and the rules remain unclear in international law.
Another private U.S. lunar lander is due to launch next month,
and the lack of rules. and the lack of rules risks bringing Washington in conflict with the widely ratified 1967 Outer space treaty, according to lawyers.
That pact says countries must authorize and supervisor the activities of non-governmental entities.
That raises the stakes for the space industry,
the Biden administration and lawmakers who have battled for months over how to regulate novel commercial space
activities with industry groups resisting what they call innovation stifling regulations.
One entrepreneur says overly restrictive regulations could destroy an industry before it gets off the ground.
I don't have opinions,
I have demonstrable facts.
These facts are validated and these facts are repeatable.
Fact number 1,
no one has ever shown that too many missions of carbon dioxide drive global warming.
never been shown and if it could be shown then you would have to show that the 97% of the emissions which are natural do not drive global warming.
Game over we are dealing with a fraud and it's a scientific fraud from day one.
We hear the propaganda that increases of the gas of life,
a trace gas in the atmosphere,
will bring a disaster and that we will have run away global warming.
Sorry,
we have known for 200 years from chemistry that it's the exact inverse.
I'm sure שכמה of you tried this last night at the dinner
with a champagne or a beer and you forgot to drink it and it warmed up and b�לing and b�לing and b�לing.
And that is the inverse solitude of carbon dioxide.
We have known that for 200 years.
We see it from the ice cores.
When we drill into ice,
we have chemical fingerprints that tell us what the temperature was and we have little bits of trapped air.
And we can show that when we had natural warming,
some 650 to 6,000 years later,
we had an increase in carbon dioxide.
It's not carbon dioxide, it's a large temperature, it's CIGSAC inverse.
another fraud.
We never hear about the major greenhouse gas,
which is water vapor.
And water vapor has a remarkable property, this weird water.
When we evaporate water,
we need energy to do that.
Now, הגרינסטארט knows this, because I never get up a sweat,
and when you get up a sweat, you feel that the skin is cold because you are taking energy to evaporate that water.
And when you precipitate that water, there's rain, snow or ice,
it gives it out energy,
exactly the same amount that it took up.
It is water vapor,
and water,
clouds, whatever 4 formatsים,
are the air conditioner of our planet's atmosphere.
It is not a thrice gas,
which is why the 115 models don't work.
This is because they are trying to create a model that proves that carbon dioxide is deום and gloom.
And we've had
these sort of predictions for a long time.
And in this absolutely wonderful time I have a chapter devoted to predictions and I've looked at 2,000 years of predictions.
People predicting the end of the world.
And we've had thousands of highly qualified,
eminent people, predicting the end of the world.
If just one of these was correct,
we wouldn't be here.
So there's only one type of prediction you can make, which is correct,
and that is if someone's predicting the end of the world,
knocks on your door,
soot the dog onto them,
because he's got history on your side.
And we hear about climate scientists what over that years.
Now, in geology, we have a 250 year track record of arguing about climate.
textbooks are full of it.
We've been labouring about climate for a long while and there's a sudden new invention of climate science.
And I had some of these when I was head of the department of the university,
but I know that they have not been able to work out of it, but I know that they don't have a lot of it, but the end result of that is that they put good people out of work
and they cost our nation trillions.
So there's one group of people that use models,
another group of people,
I mean, this is really simple, we use evidence.
And the two are not in a code.
And if they're not in a code, you've got to throw out the models, which we've seen time and time again are incorrect.
So we can look back in the past
and we can see that we've had six great ice ages.
During that ice age we'll have the ice expand,
that's a glaciation,
we'll can't track that's an inter-glacial.
We are currently in an inter-glacial,
all when I say that started on a Thursday with 34 million years ago and the ice has come and gone.
In our last inter-glyse,
the sea level was about 7 meters high.
The temperature was about 5 degrees warmer.
So if someone says,
Oh, this is the hottest day on the record,
you have to ask,
since when?
If it's the hottest day in the last 130,000 years,
then that is a record.
But since when?
So if we go to the peak of our inter-glacial,
which was about 4,000 years ago,
it was about 5 degrees warmer.
So it's cooler than the hottest temperature on the record.
If we go to the time of Jesus,
when it was warm,
it's about 4 degrees cooler.
And then if we go to the dark ages, to go to the Viking Age,
we've actually warmed up since then.
If we go to the medieval warming,
we've cooled down since then.
And if we go to the little ice age, we've warmed up since then.
So since when?
And I know this is going to surprise you, but we just come out of a little ice.
What do you think temperature is going to do?
Full or rise?
It's been rising since the moon to minimum, more than 300 years ago.
So it is no surprise that if you have cut off times for temperature or for sea level or for hurricanes or whatever,
you can spin what you want to do.
these 6 great ice ages started when we had more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than now.
We have 0.04% of that gas in the atmosphere,
which is meant to be a pollutant,
which is colorless, odless and tasteless,
but this pollutant is meant to kill you.
We have a problem with the crisis.
It's not a crisis of climate, it's a crisis of common sense.
It's a crisis of government policy.
It's a crisis of education.
And we hear words like emissions.
Well, that means nothing to me.
Because the atmosphere has changed in this carbon dioxide content from over 20% to now,
which is really low in Geological time. If we have that, all plant life would die and animals would die.
So we have a problem with language like climate crisis or extinction or emergency or transition.
But what about let's zero?
We are blessed with a small population having a continent.
We emit to the capital,
כמה מיניים של carbon dioxide,
and this is because we are a mining and smelting nation.
We are taking a hit
for other nations by smelting אלימונים, zinc,
lead and copper.
And if we look at the total emissions of the Australians,
and then look at the total amount of carbon dioxide that we absorb through our grasslands,
our randland,
our crops, our forests,
and our continental.
We only absorb 10 times as much carbon dioxide as we emit.
So we have to revanche at Paris and go to them and say, look,
we want these incredibly wealthy countries that put out carbon dioxide, like Chad and Mauritania,
to pie up,
give us some money, we are doing a a bit.
So this whole business is ridiculous.
This is gone berserk.
We are now told what we can eat and you can do the sums for beef by growing beef and sequestering carbon.
We actually at zero prices already.
No one is telling the greens that what they can eat,
we don't say to the greens, you don't have to eat tofu,
because because now animals in that process.
But they are doing it to be healthy meat-אטים.
עכשיו, I know from running
גיאולוגיה,
field tripss of students,
that you would stop at an out shop.
The meat-אטים, they would be the first to the top of the mountain.
Halfway would be the vegetarians,
you know,
puffing out celery gיס,
and the vegans are still trying to work out how to get out of the vehicle.
So, I am quite happy to be a meat eater.
And we had one of our former Prime ministers or Prime monsters that tell us that this was the greatest moral crisis.
It is a moral crisis.
It's a moral crisis.
It's a moral crisis. Because the fundamentals of science are that you do not tamper with the original evidence.
That has happened with their temperature record.
Where the past has been called, and it makes it look as if we are women.
That is fraud.
And the whole process is based on fraud.
We are terrorizing young children. We are scaring them wittless about the end of the world.
And with a 30 second search on your mobile phone,
you would know
that the world's not going to end, that the hurricanes and the sea levels,
nothing to worry about it, nothing to see here.
And this whole concept now has given us renewables.
Now, these renewables, they did a complete re-wiring of the grid.
These renewables, wind and solar, if you want to build them,
you expend more energy in building them than you do what they'll purchase.
If you want to build wind and solar,
the amount of carbon oxide to build them is more than they'll say.
So why is it spent
טריליאנס? It's just not right.
We also have that been flowing on to hydrogen,
not enough time for that, electric vehicles or pumped hydro.
But what we're doing is we are making ourselves very vulnerable in this country.
Solar panels and wind turbines turbines come from China.
Our wind turbines and solar panels have a very short life.
If we kill off our coal and gas generation and have no nuclear,
China completely controls the amount of energy we can produce in this country.
That is really strategically stupid.
And there's only one country in the world
that really survived by using solar.
And it's Spain. I mean, the Spanians are incredibly clever.
And they have learned to be able to generate solar power at night.
You heard that correctly.
So how did they do it?
It was very simple.
The subsidies are so generous that you can afford to run a diesel gen set and floodlight solar panels and still make a quill.
And that is telling us that this is a scam.
The whole lot is a con and a scam.
And I forget the birds and the bats and the scenery and farmland
and getting destroyed by solar and wind.
We all know about that.
But do we know that if we put up solar panels that I have built by slave labor in China.
So if you are a supporter of solar,
you obviously have to be a supporter of slavery.
If you are wandering around in your electric vehicle,
prancing around around,
morally superior,
then you need to be able to answer the question,
well,
why is it that you are driving an electric vehicle,
when that cobald, most of it comes from the Congo, is mind by black slave children and the cobald goes to China.
Just after that. And that's where we conservatives have gone wrong.
We have been on the back foot.
We never attacked and we have to attack the morality of the other side.
Very easy to do because there's nothing there.
We have a lot of that.
I won't go into what drives this. Zיבי gave his 20 points. Absolutely magnificent.
And he didn't really go into the mainstream media.
There was once a time when it was a calling to be a journalist.
We got one or two of them here.
We had breakfast this morning with Piaz Ackerman. He's one of those.
A Sky. But most journalists are now activists. They are stenographers for the greens.
And that's what you are up against.
So what is this attack led to?
It's got nothing to do with the environment.
It's got nothing to do with climate.
It's all about power by un-elected people and all about money.
And they are attacking your freedoms.
They are attacking our environment.
They are attacking your wallet.
They are taking the money from the poor and giving it to the rich.
So this is what we are up against. We are up against those who lie.
We are up against those who are fraudulent and cook the books.
So why do we write books?
Like green murder. Well, that's exactly what it is.
Green policy lead to people dying.
Imagine imagine this winter in England, if you are a pensioner.
You can afford, perhaps, to eat one room,
perhaps to have a hot meal and perhaps to have a warm share, but you can't have all three.
Now, this is a great country that's been destroyed by green policies.
We are killing people with green policies.
So I write books like this,
such that you can end up like me. I mean, what a horrible thought,
for you to end up like me.
But you too can be canceled.
You too can be stopped from talking at the universities.
You too can not be invited to dinner parties.
You too can not have any mainstream bookseller.
Sell this. you can, greenmurder.com is a place to go for it, or outside at lunchtime.
But we have to fight and you have to fight with thatch and we have to fight
much much much יותר טוב. This is not the climate, it's being threatened. It's the future of our children.
And what we are facing is a 50 year dומing down of our education system where our children cannot
realize that they have been taught codzvallet.
They haven't been given the skills of argument,
of critical analysis and thinking and they are having their futures slaughtered.
It is time to fight.
It is not time to be like a normal conservative,
polite and not.
You have to have your facts and you have to be able to fight fire with fire.
And if you can't,
then ask a really simple question. If someone says, Oh, you know, this is the worst floods we've ever had.
And all you've got to say is, well, that's interesting.
Please show me the evidence.
This is all based on evidence, not propaganda,
and not feelings.
feelings can lead you astray.
especially hormonically driven feelings, which give you huge problems in later in life.
So it is time to fight and it's time not to let one word or sentence
proceed in a discussion without you standing up and fighting.
That's why I write books,
to give you the tools for fighting.
Because we're all in this together.
Thank you.
מחיאות ומחיאות ומחיאות
![מחרוזת שירי קפ"ז | הרב אמנון יצחק [שיר]](https://shofar.tv/storage/thumb/videos/V014860_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2024]](/storage/thumb/videos/V018106_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2023]](/storage/thumb/videos/V017157_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2020] - עם כתוביות באנגלית](/storage/thumb/videos/V016615_150.jpg)
![חוזרים בעבר - מיקס - חלק 2 [3:30 שעות!]](/storage/thumb/videos/V015619_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2022] 3 שעות!](/storage/thumb/videos/V015525_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2021] - עם כתוביות באנגלית](/storage/thumb/videos/V014960_150.jpg)
![הכל יודוך | הרב אמנון יצחק [שיר]](/storage/thumb/videos/V015560_150.jpg)
![ושמחת בימיך | הרב אמנון יצחק [שיר]](/storage/thumb/videos/V015558_150.jpg)
![מחרוזת שירי קפ"ז | הרב אמנון יצחק [שיר]](/storage/thumb/videos/V014860_150.jpg)
![[שיר] נאד נפוח • ביצוע: הרב אמנון יצחק](/storage/thumb/videos/V014415_150.jpg)
