חדשות וירוס TV - מהדורה 829 • יש מלחמה... אין שקורונה - חלק ב' • 29-10-2023
- - - לא מוגה! - - -
In the following six published papers and
he examines their body of work,
and finds that their conclusions contradict the claims made in the titles and or the introductions.
The Kim paper has something really problematic,
and this doesn't come from the conclusion,
it comes from the introduction section.
And they said that a new corona virus was identified as the causative agent of this unexplained pneumonia in January 2020. Now, this is a very bold statement.
This is reference number 7. It doesn't say anything about causation anywhere. In the introduction, it says, a novel corona virus is associated with human to human transition and severe human infection.
So once again, association is not causation.
And in the conclusion, it talks about potential association.
So in other words,
there is some kind of association, we need more research, we haven't proven anything.
They gave a reference, and it's not in the reference.
This is a serious ethical violation here, to make such an important claim.
All of the world policies are based upon this claim that it is a causative agent,
and they cannot reference any science to back that up whatsoever.
And rumors and lies,
COVID-19-19,
COVID-19, is the cause of a pandemic, with no proof.
No proof whatsoever.
Do doctors read these papers?
Well,
doctors in general don't read any papers and many of them actually don't know how to read a paper.
The important point is that the way the system sets you up to be a doctor
is that the only way to make a living for almost all doctors is to see large volumes של אנשים מאוד מאוד קצועים.
Some doctors even see one patient every six minutes,
so they can have 10 in an hour.
Now, if you're this busy trying to just make a living,
when are you going to have the time to sit down and read an article?
So what usually happens is that there are services for doctors,
like, for example, MedScape,
which curates articles,
of course, they choose which ones to curate,
and they put little blurbs,
like basically the title in one sentence,
and they're pretty much just summarizing the conclusions.
So the doctors see this, and then they assume that what is stated in the title of the article or in these short bullet points is actually valid,
whereas if they would read the papers, they would find that that's not the case at all.
Now, if you say, why don't you just show me the,
you know, the teeming particles in the lung fluid of the sick person?
They say things like, well, there's not enough virus to find in the lung flu.
Which then begs the question, if there's not enough virus to find what makes you think it's going to kill us all?
They say that this is a wrong way of thinking because
viruses are only intras-cellular pathogens.
Meaning you obviously,
silly Tom,
can't find loose virus,
free virus,
because they're all because they're all only inside the cell and so you could only find them by looking at cells.
It has to get free in order to be transmissible.
That's what they say.
The classic techniques used to purify so called viruses associated with microorganisms is
generally done with what's called a density gradient ultra-centric regression.
And that's when you just put different sugar solutions in a test tube
with the more dense
and you add your sample and it spins around really fast and separates things by the density.
So all the viral particles of the same variety will have the same density and they'll form a very tight band in your test tube and you'll be able to extract that in the purified state. This is isolation, you separate it from everything else.
But they don't.
What they say is an isolation,
כאשר הם יכולים לעשות אף אחד במטרס האחרון.
אף אחד לא יכול לעשות אף אחד במטרס האחרון.
The so called virus isolation experiments are the experiments that are used to prove
the existence of all pathogenic viruses.
היי, אנד,
תראי את הידיים של האחרון האנשים שאני קראתי בגלל שאני קראתי בצלח ומפזור את האחרונים מהתולדות.
בוא נקראם להם לירושים ואומר שהם קרוויה בווירוס שהיו קרו את האחרונים.
We call this line of isolation.
It's a process of decay.
What we are thinking we are starting to do with our ked Romans,
is a process of decay of time.
So what is a tissue culture?
A tissue culture is a way to grow cells artificial בשביל בתקופה.
What kind of tissue do they use?
Well, they use a variety of different cells,
אבל המרכזיות הן מה שנקרא
זירו-סל, שהן קידני של המונקי.
אז זירו-סל הם יותר או יותר משפטים לציונות החוץים החשובים,
נכון?
כן, הם הולכים להתמודד את הטל שיהיה אינפקט מהווירוס.
לא מעניין שהם אומרים שהווירוס אינפקט את החיים של האנשים,
אז למה הם לא לקבל קול קולים מהאנשים?
הם לקבל קול קול קול קול קול קול קול קול בקל אקספירימנט,
אבל אלה היו קול קול קול קול קול קול.
אז אחרי הם נותנים אנטי-ביוטיקים.
ג'נטמייסן, לדבר ספציפי?
עכשיו, זה קשור,
כי ההתמודדות היא שהיא תאמן את הקול קול קול קול קול בקטריאלי של האקספירימנט.
למרות,
בקטריה הן הרבה מאוד גדולות ויכולות להסביר מזלח את המספר,
פשוט להשתמש בקול קול קול.
האנטי-ביוטיקים הן טוקסיות לציונות,
And in these experiments where almost all of them use monkey kidney cells they also use specific antibiotics that are known to be toxic to kidney cells.
So this essentially acts to poison the cell culture and if he's not the main factor, it certainly is a strong contributing factor for the damage that is seen and said and attributed
to be some virus.
So we have vירו-cells and we have antibiotics.
What about the בווין פיטל-cap serum?
This process of dying, you can only slow down with פיטל סירה.
סירה for פיטל-יום-בים, for פיטל-מממלס.
I mean, incredible.
Only then the decay is slowed down,
and only with this they can do the...
It's a culture work.
This out of the...
...fיטל-סירה, they would have you to call it to the care.
So why is it said that the cultures are starved?
It does not have the full compliment of nutrition.
So it would be like us being on a special modified diet,
low calorie diet,
or a bread and water diet, or an elimination diet,
something that will keep us alive,
but will not make us optically healthy.
So the cultures now basically toxic and starved.
Now, what happens?
Well, in the so called virus isolation experiments, which are really tissue culture experiments,
they add the body fluid from a person who is alleged to be sick with this illness, caused by an alleged virus,
they add that to the cell culture and then they show that over time the cells in the cell culture become damaged and disintegrate into particles as all damaged and dying cells do,
but they say that it's caused by a virus.
Now,
since there are many many many things in the body fluid from a sick person,
how do we know that one of those other things besides the virus, which by the way,
we don't even know there's a virus in there for sure,
but we only have suspicion.
How do we know that it's not one of those other components because we're talking
about fluid from a dead and dying part of the body, that's disease.
So now that the sample is in the culture flask,
do they just wait to see what happens?
They watch it until they get what they call Cytopathic effects,
which are changes in the shape of the cells that they can see under the microscope that indicate the cells are damaged and dying.
Why the tissues and cells are dying in the test tube?
Because they are intoxicized with highly toxic antibiotics.
They stafed to death because they are reducing the nutrition.
And this is the reason why it's dying in the test tube.
In the virality of the literature,
the word isolate,
they once again invert the meaning and instead of separate from other things,
what they mean is add to more things.
So in other words, increase the complexity of the mixture rather than purify out a single component so you can study it.
So, Andy, why don't they just look at the cell culture by itself and see if those monkey kidney cells die before they put any sample from anybody in there?
Well,
it would overturn the whole virus theory that would upset
In.
התייחסמת מילים טובות רסיטים רחבים גבוהות חייבים גורסות לפער מלחמה במדינות מירות.
-אם תעש מח דומה גדולה למחירים אחרים?
אנחנו נותנים?
נותנים לנו קצוע קצועים.
ניתן לדיונים בוודאות תעשייה בוודאות שטח לחיקויות מיומיות רוח שטח בוודאות קבע מילות רגולות ב-1949.
ב. ה.ג.ג. מג. טח לאפשרותיי קצועים.
כמו כמו שבשורים כמו שהם מחירים בערך,
עכשיו נקבעה בקרובי פנדמי,
אשר נסתר להיבחן קצת.
עכשיו,
כשעוד גלן כולל כמעט 100,000 דולר,
וההצעה שתסתכל,
לא משמעותה.
אז פייזר CFO,
פרנק דמיליו,
צודקת ברגע שהקבוצה המשמעותית היא ב-150 ל-175 דולר.
לדוגיה של הוירוסים והוירולוגיה היא אפילו מעוניות בגלל שהם לא משתמשים בכמה מהמסתכלים הכי בסיסיונות לתאר שאתה לא משתמשים את הבסיסות.
למשל, הם לא משתמשים אקספרימנטים המשמעותית.
אז כל הכספים שלהם, שאינם לא משתמשים אקספרימנטים פרטוריים,
הם המספר,
והסרטיות הטסטיות עדיין.
אז מה עם הפוטות הוירוסים שאתם רואים?
כשאתם רואים מיקרוסקופים,
הרבה מהם הם אימדים במדינות,
CGI,
לדפק את מה שהם חושבים או חושבים שהווירוס כלשהו נראה כאילו.
עכשיו, כשאתם רואים פוטוגרפים רבים במיקרוסקופים,
מאוד פעמים אתם רואים את של דברי,
פרטיקות של שלבים שהם מתחילים,
דמי, או באיזשהו חלק מהאקטיבות,
שהם בעצם מתחילים בגלל המיקרוסקופים כלשהם.
זאת תודה רבה מאוד מעניינת, שאנחנו אקספלו גם בפרט 2.
בכל זאת, מה הטבעים הטבעים של מיקרוסקופיה?
אם אנחנו עושים תוצאים תוצאים קונבנציות,
אנחנו מסיימים,
ובסגרת על מיקרוסקופים ועל מיקרוסקופים,
אנחנו נראים דברים אחרים.
למשל, במסגרת היסטולוגיה,
אתה תוצאים על סטיינים כדי להביא את אלמנות אחרות.
מיקרוסקפיה חייבה,
שזה מה שאני עושה כל כך הרבה שנים,
יכולה לך לראות את הדברים ברחובות המתחילות.
עכשיו, הרסולוציה לא כל כך רגע למיקרוסקופ האלקטרון,
אבל בנוגע שאתה רואה את הדברים ברחובות המתחילות.
ומיקרוסקופ האקטרון?
מיקרוסקופ האקטרון לא משתמשך חיים.
אתה צריך לטפוח את הטשו,
נפגש על הסליד ומסתן אותו עם מטאליק די,
כי מה שהמיקרוסקופ עושה הוא מיטל,
ולא מגיע לו מיטל.
הנה כך שאתה מוציא את מיטל מיקרוסקופיה של מיטל.
אתה קליח
מיטל מיטל ומסרד אותה כמו פלנדר,
ואז אתה מפריז אותה ל-150 קצות,
ואז אתה מסתן אותו עם מיטל סטיינים,
ואז אתה נותן אנזיים בזה,
ואז אתה מסתן אותו עם אדם אלקטרוני שפורסם את הכל,
ואז אתה רואה תמידה שני-דימנציונית.
אז מה המציאות נכון?
זה נראה משמעותי.
In a living body, whether it's an animal or a human,
there are a myriad of feedback systems that are all working
continuously with each other,
including a very elaborate communication system with the external environment that's
keeping that homeostatic mechanism going the entire time.
And if you take a few cells out of a body,
put it into an in vitro contrived situation,
that has nothing to do with a real body in real life.
You're eliminating all these other factors.
I'm not saying there's maybe not a time and place for those kinds of studies,
maybe we can't learn something,
אבל אין
איזה תל אדם יכולים להתאר איך זה
ולתפלו את זה ל-Idead of a living body with a consciousness,
animal או human.
זה באמת סליח.
So like a ribosone is always a perfect circle,
which can't possibly be after something was put in a blender,
you know, even if it was a perfect circle out of two-dimensional picture means it was a sphere in real life.
And if you put an orange in a blender, it's never going to make perfect circles.
This is a good time to raise the issue of artifacts.
A defect in an image that appears as a result of the technology and methods used to create and process the image.
Dyes, for example,
can and do create artifacts.
heavy metal stains displaces the molecules that you're looking at in the sample.
So you're not actually seeing a protein or a membrane.
What you're seeing is heavy metals in a block of tissue that you're looking at.
It's almost as if you're looking at the shadow of an object rather than the object itself,
and you're trying to learn from the shadow without having the real thing.
When you see the halo around the micrograph of the supposed corona of the virus.
When you see a halo, you see black dots within the circle.
OK. And those have been actually identified as a human protein called Plathrin.
They're in the kidneys, they're in the lungs.
That protein is sort of ubiquitous.
Is that the corona thing that they call?
Because they're the spikes.
The spikes.
So they're not a spike protein?
They're not a spike protein.
What is a spike protein?
The spike protein,
the best we can't figure is some protein that's attached to a certain sequence that has been synthesized in a laborator.
And the virus is basically the cover story or the path.
So actually they made them. So actually, they made a protein that has a certain המולוגיה with another protein called Cinsidine, which is found like in ovres and testicles and uterus and blood vessels.
And it's
seems to be similar to that protein,
although they changed it a little bit.
And so they made it into basically a toxin.
And then they're trying to inject a sequence of RNA
RNA to make you to make you make that toxin.
And then I think they figured somebody might say,
הי, where did I get that toxin from?
And so they'll say, well, you got it because you had a virus.
And the virus has that protein on it.
So the corona virus is the acid or the spike protein.
And then they inject them. And then they inject you with the sequence to make you make it.
Why? Because the corona virus has it. And so that's what gets you immune to the corona virus.
It's a brilliant story.
It really is. So this is what they were doing in those Gain of function Labs when they
bamboוזל the entire anti-vac community.
Not surprising.
Well, that's part of the genius of the clan.
Yes.
Nobody should think these people are stupid.
אל תודה.