חדשות וירוס TV - מהדורה 736 • שקורונה: מודל 65, יד ראשונה, מ"רופא"... - המהדורה הכי חשובה שאי פעם תראו • 06-06-2023

 

- - - לא מוגה! - - - 

אדוני היושב-ראש, חברות וחברות הכנסת עורכי גבוהות,

CNN released its 20th weekly outbreak report of the year, last Wednesday. COVID-19 infections topped the list for the fourth consecutive week, with infection cases quadrופלים, from week 17 of this year to week 20. A citizen in Beijing told NTD that authorities are calling for emergency preparations.

Our sub-district office handed out a notice this morning, advising us to prepare pandemic prevention supplies in advance.

They said it was a guideline by the municipal health commission.

A doctor in Beijing said 70% of recent fever clinic visitors were COVID-19 patients.

Of these 80% were first time infections, with re-infection rates also on the rise.

Elsewhere in China, doctors echoed those findings.

It's true that in the last two weeks we have seen far more COVID-19 patients than before.

Most of them were infected for the first time.

Our hospitals are seeing a recent rise in re-infection.

There was even a bed shortage a few days ago.

Compared to the earlier outbreak this year,

some patients have noticed different symptoms from the current wave. Reportedly caused by the XBB on sub-Varיאנטס.

This time, the symptoms include severe fever as well as sore throat.

I didn't have such a bad fever when I was infected the first time.

Others said they have no. Others said they have no choice, but to go to work, despite the infections. That's to make ends meet a mid-סורing unemployment and an economic downturn.

This problem further contributing to virus spread.

It is a... it is a... it is a particularly interesting location for me to be sitting today, given that

over a decade ago I sat in this very chair right here in the European Union Parliament.

And at that time I warned the world of what was coming.

During that conversation that was hosted at the time by the green and EFA and a number

of the other parties of the other parties, of the European Union Union.

Various representationים. We were having a conversation on whether Europe

should adopt the United States policy of allowing for the patents on biologically derived materials.

And at the time I urged this body and I urged people around the world

that the weaponization of nature against humanity had dire consequences.

טראגית, אני יושב כאן היום עם המלחמה שאני לא אוהב אותך לומר שאני אמרתי לך כך שכן אני אמרתי לך שכך.

אבל האמת היא שהאמת היא שאנחנו כאן לא בשביל

ההחלטה על החלטות אחרות, אנחנו כאן באמת לעוד פעם ראשונה ולצביעות את השאלה האנושית ולצביעות את השאלה מי רוצים להיות?

מה אנחנו רוצים שהאמנות תראה כאילו?

And rather than seeing this as an exercise in futility, which is very easy from time to time when you're in the position I'm in,

I actually see this not as an exercise in futility, I see this as one of the greatest opportunities that faces us, because we now have a public conversation,

which is now front and center in people's minds. When this was an esoteric conversation about biological patents,

nobody cared.

But when that conversation came home, then it became something people can care about.

So I'm actually quite grateful for this opportunity.

I thank the members of parliament for hosting this.

I thank all of the translators who I apologize in advance. I will use terminology that is probably very difficult to translate,

so my apologies.

And I also like to acknowledge the fact that many of you are aware of my involvement with this,

in large part due to the amazing work of my wonderful wife,

קים מרטין,

who encouraged me at the very early days of this pandemic to get on front of the camera and talk about all the information that I had been sharing among very small groups

around the world.

And it was in fact her encouragement that put me in a place where many of you have heard what I have to say.

אירונית,

the world that I came from,

that used to be very popular,

my CNBC and Bloomberg presentations,

which were televise על mainstream media around the world,

was an audience that I lost.

I can confidently say COVID diminished my fame.

But I can also confidently say that I'd rather stand among the people with whom I'm standing today than any of the folks that were part of that previous world.

So this is a much better place to be.

My role today is to set the stage for this conversation in a historical context because this did not come in the last three years. This did not come in the last five or six years. This actually is an ongoing question that probably began here in Europe in the early stages of the mid-1900,

but certainly by 1913, 1914, this conversation started right here in Central Europe.

The pandemic, the pandemic, the pandemic that we alleged to have happened in the last few years also did not happen overnight.

In fact, the very specific pandemic pandemic using corona virus began in a very different time.

We'll try to advance the slides here with

one of these things.

Oh, there we go.

כלומר, אדוני היושב-ראש, כמי חייבים לציין שהדברים שלי לא יבוצעים כמיוחדים ב-1965.

הקורונה הולכים לציין ב-1965 כאחד מהשלושות הטובות של רפליקה רבותיים שיכולים לציין מספר מיני אצל רבות אחרות.

It was isolated once upon a time associated with the common cold.

But what's particularly interesting about it's isolation in 1965 was if it was immediately identified as a pathogen that could be used and modified for a whole host of reasons.

And you heard me correctly, that was 1965. And by the way, these slides are public domain.

You're welcome to look at every single reference. Every comment that I made is based on published material.

So do make sure that you look at those references.

But in 1966,

the very first COV,

corona virus model,

was used as a trans-atlantic,

biological experiment and human manipulation.

And you heard the date 1966.

I hope you're getting the point of what I'm saying.

This is not an overnight thing.

This is actually something that's been long in the making.

A year before I was born,

we had the first Trans-Atlantic coronavirus data sharing experiment between the United States and the United Kingdom.

And in 1967, the year I was born,

we did the first human trials on inoculating people with modified corona virus.

Isn't that amazing?

56 years ago,

the overnight success of a pathogen that's been 56 years in engineering.

And I want that to chill with all of you.

Where were we when we actually allowed in violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties,

where were we

as a human civilization when we thought it was an acceptable thing to do,

to take a pathogen for the United States and infect the world with it?

Where was that conversation? And what should have been that conversation in 1967?

That conversation wasn't had.

Ironically, the common cold was turned into a chimera in the 1970s.

And in 1975, 1976, 1977, we started figuring out how to modify the corona virus by putting it into different animals,

pigs, pigs, pigs, and dogs.

And not surprisingly,

by the time we got to 1990,

we found out that the corona virus as an infectious agent was an industrial problem for two primary industries,

the industries of dogs and pigs.

Dog breeders and pigs found that the corona virus created gastro-intestinal problems and that became the basis for Pfizer's first spike protein vaccine patent.

Fyld, are you ready for this?

In 1990.

did you hear what I just said?

1990. Operation Warp Speed?

I'm sorry.

Where's the Warp and the Speed?

Pfizer, 1990. The very first spike protein vaccine for the corona virus.

איזה זה מעניין?

איזה מעניין אנחנו אמרנו שאנחנו אמרים שה spike protein

is a new thing is a new thing. We just found out that that's the problem.

No.

As a matter of fact, we didn't just find out that it was not just now the problem.

We found out that in 1990 and filed the first patents on vaccines in 1990 for the spike protein of the corona virus.

And who would have thought? Pfizer.

Clearly the innocent organization that does nothing but promote human health.

Clearly Pfizer.

The organization that has not bought the votes in this chamber and at every chamber of every government around the world.

Not that Pfizer.

Certainly they wouldn't have had anything to do with this.

But oh yes, they did.

And in 1990 they found out that there was a problem with vaccines.

They didn't work.

You know why they didn't work?

It turns out that the corona virus is a very malleable model. It transforms and it changes and it mutate over time. As a matter of fact, every publication on vaccines for the corona virus, from 1990 until 2018,

every single publication concluded that the corona virus escapes the vaccine impulse because it modifies and mutates too quickly for vaccines to be effective.

And since 1990 to 2018, that is the published science,

ladies and gentlemen, that's following the science.

Following the science is their own indictment of their own programs that said it doesn't work.

And there are thousands of publications, to the effect, not a few hundred,

and not paid for by pharmaceutical companies.

these are publications that are independent scientific research

that shows unequipות, including efforts of the KAMERA modifications made by רלף ברק מהאוניברסיטת נורת קרונת צ'פל-היל.

All of them show vaccines do not work on the corona virus.

That's the science.

And that's science has never been disputed.

But then we had an interesting development in 2002.

And this data is most important.

Because in 2002, the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill patented, and I quote, an infectious replication defective clone of the corona virus.

Listen to those words, infectious replication defective.

What does that phrase actually mean?

For those of you not familiar with language,

let me unpack it for you.

Infectious replication defective means a weapon.

It means something meant to target an individual but not have collateral damage to other individuals.

That's what Infectious replication defective means.

And that patent was filed in 2002 on work funded by NIAID's

אנת'נת' אורטי אנת'נטי אנת'נטי פאוצ'י,

ועובדים ב-1999 עד 2002.

עבודותו פריטיונסיטה באוניברסיטה בנות קרונית צ'פל-היל.

No, אפשר לחזור לנו את סארס 1.0 בנהל.

דב,

האם אתם מבחינת שסארס 1.0 לא נמצא מבחינת מורחבת ברית בווהאן?

האם אתם מבחינת שזה לא יזכו לידיוניברסיטה באוניברסיטה של נות קרונית צ'פל-היל?

לא, לא, אני לא מבחינת את זה.

I'm telling you, that's the facts.

We engineered SARS. SARS is not a naturally occurring phenomenon.

The naturally occurring phenomenon is called the common cold.

It's called influenza-like illness.

It's called gastroenteritis.

That's the naturally occurring corona virus.

SARS is the research developed by humans,

weaponizing a life system model to actually attack human beings.

And they patented it in 2002.

And in 2003, giant surprise,

the CDC filed the patent on the corona virus isolated from humans in violation, once again, of biological and chemical weapons, treaties and laws that we have in the United States. And I'm very precise on this.

The United States likes to talk about its rights and everything else and the rule of law and all the nonsense we like to talk about.

But we don't ratify treaties about,

אני לא יודע,

defending humans.

We conspicuously avoid

that. We actually have a great track record of advocating for human rights and then denying them, when it comes to actually being part of the international community, which is a slightly problematic thing.

But let's get something very clear.

When the CDC, in April 2003, filed the patent on SARS corona virus isolated from humans,

what did they do?

They downloaded a sequence from China and filed a patent on it in the United States.

And if you are familiar with biological and chemical weapons treaties knows, that's a violation.

That's a crime.

That's not an innocent oops.

That's a crime.

And the United States patent office went as far as to reject that patent application on two occasions,

until the CDC decided to bribe the patent office,

to override the patent in the patent in 2007, to ultimately issue the patent in 2007 on SARS coronavirus.

But let's not let that get away from us. Because it turns out that the RT-PCR,

which was the test that we allegedly were going to use to identify the risks associated with the corona virus,

was actually identified as a bi�רוריזם,

by me,

in the European Union sponsored events in 2002 and 2003.

20 years ago.

That happened here in Brussels and across אירופה.

In 2005,

this particular pathogen this particular pathogen was specifically labeled as a bi�רוריזם and bio-weapon platform technology.

Described as such, that's not my terminology that I'm applying to it, it was actually described as a bi�רמיוחים ביותר טרוריזם ביותר 2005.

And from 2005 onwards, it was actually a bi�רוריזם ביווחריזם. It's official classification from 2005 forward.

I don't know if that sounds like public health to you.

does it?

Biological warfare enabling technology that feels like not public health, that feels like not medicine, that feels like a weapon, that feels like a weapon.

Designed to take out humanity, that's what it feels like.

And it feels like that because that's exactly what it is.

We have been blurred into believing that EcoHealth Alliance and DARPA and all of these organizations are what we should be pointing to.

But we have been specifically requested to ignore the facts that over 10

million dollars have been funneled through black operations through the check of אנת'ני פאוצ'י. And a side by side ledger, where N.I.I.D. has a balance sheet and next to it is a

ביו-difense balance sheet,

אקוווילנט דולר-אחר-דולר,

שאיש אחד מהמדינה מדבר עליו.

And it's been going on since 2005.

Our Gain a function מורטוריום,

המורטוריום שהיה אפשר להחזיר

כל מיני מנהיגים לעבוד גן פונקשי.

Conveniently, בפעם של 2014,

האוניברסיטת בנורת קרילה,

צ'פל הילד,

לקראת מרצת ה-N.I.I.D.

שאומרת שהגן מורטוריום של קורונה

וירוס אינבייבו צריך להיות סוספנד בגלל שהגנותיהם שלהם כבר חשבו,

הם לקבלו איזושהי.

אתם רואים מה שאני אמרתי?

איזושהי מורטוריום של קורונה ביולוגית לבדוק באוניברסיטת נורת קלילה,

צ'פל הילה,

לקבלו איזושהי מורטוריום של הגן-הפונקשי,

כדי שב-2016 אנחנו יכולים להצטרף את העבודה הזאת שאומרת,

סארס קורונה וירוס מורטוריום מורטוריום.

ב-2016.

ומה,

אתה יכול לבקש,

דייב,

היה הקורונה הווירוס פורסם לבדוק באוניברסיטה האנושית?

זה היה W.I.V. 1. ווהאן, אינסטיטוט אבוורולוגיה,

וירוס 1. פורסם לבדוק באוניברסיטה האנושית ב-2016,

במוצעות של מדינת ישראל,

אקדמי המדעים.

כך שבמשך שנעשו ל-2017 ו-2018,

המלגה המסגרתה השלישית היתה להתפתחות בעבודה בעבודה.

יש יום רציחה להחליטה אקצינית או רציחה להחליטה רציחה רציחה רציחה.

המלגה המסגרתית, כמובן, בשלושה שחלישה, הרציחה המסגרתית.

זה קשור כאילו כאילו?

זה קשור כאילו כאילו ופנגלון

והוא הולך במרכז הנהרות בווהאן וקולעו ולמשך וחכוונו וליכולנו,

וכמובן קיבלנו סארס קובי 2?

לא.

ברציחה רציחה רציחה רציחה רציחה רציחה רציחה רציחה רציחה רציחה רציחה.

וכמובן, באפריל 2019,

שבעה חודשים לפני ההשגה של פאנט 1,

ארבע פטנטים של מדרינה היו מודפים כדי לקבל את הטרם

accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen as the justification for making a vaccine for a thing that did not exist.

Thank you.

If you have not done so, please make sure you make reference to this in every investigation to the pre-meditation nature of this,

because it was in September of 2019 that the world was informed that we were going to have an accidental orGOg doctoral release of a respiratory pathogen so that by

ספטמבר 2020,

תהיה תמצאות מדינת אוניברסלית תמפליט אוניברסלית.

אלה מילים שלהם, בפניכם, על הסקרן.

האינטנט הייתה להביא את המדינות לתמצות אוניברסלית תמפליט אוניברסלית,

והאינטנט הייתה לתת את הקורונה כדי להגיע לזה.

ולאחר מכן.

זה לא יפה, אז אם אני יכול לתת למה שיש לך מישהו לדעת.

בואו נראה את זה, כי אנחנו צריכים לראות את זה לרקוד כל פעם שאני אגיע.

Until an infectious disease, crisis is very real, present and at the emergency threshold, that is often largely ignored.

To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, he said, we need to increase the public understanding for the need for medical counter measures, such as a pan-influenzo or a pan-coronavirus vaccine.

A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype.

We need to use that hype to our advantage,

to get to the real issues.

Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.

Sound like public health?

Sound like the best of humanity?

No, ladies and gentlemen, this was pre-meditated domestic terrorism,

stated at the proceedings of the national academy of sciences in 2015,

published in front of them.

This is an act of biological and chemical warfare perpetrated on the human race,

and it was admitted to in writing that this was a financial heיסט and a financial fraud.

Investors will follow if they see profit at the end of the process.

Let me conclude by making 5 very brief recommendations.

The last slide.

Nature was hijacked.

This whole story started in 1965 when we decided to hijack a natural model and decided to start to manipulate it.

Science was hijacked when the only questions

that could be asked were questions authorized under the patent protection of the CDC,

ה-FDA,

ה-NIH and their equivalent organizations around the world.

We didn't have independent science, we had היי-ג'ק science.

And unfortunately, there was no moral oversight and violation of all of the codes that we stand for.

There was no independent,

financially dis-interested,

independent review board ever impנד על קורונה וירוס,

לא לפני.

לא לפני.

לא לפני.

לפני 1965. אנחנו לא נמצאים איזה אינדפנד אי-רסבי אף אחד שקיע לידי אינדפנד על קורונה וירוס.

אז ה-morality נפגעת על המדינה בין מיוחדת המדינה לגבי המדינה.

ובעצם ה-humanity נפגעת בגלל שאנחנו הצלחנו לתת להקדם.

השפעה שלנו היום היא לומר שלא לדבר יותר מ-פונקצי פונקצי פריד.

לא יותר מ-weaponization של נצור, פריד.

ומחלק מהירות נפגעים.

לא יותר מ-cורפורטי פטרינג' של מדעי המחקרות של המחקרות שלהם,

אפילו שהם מבינים 100% תחזקות של מיוחדת מיוחדת של כל מלחמה וכל מלחמה שהם מבינים. תודה רבה.

גברתי היושבת-ראש, תודה רבה.