חדשות וירוס TV - מהדורה 734 • קרטל הבנקים - חלק ב' • 04-06-2023
- - - לא מוגה! - - -
אז בנק ישראל מעלה את הריבית שלו, ותאורטית, עכשיו אתם יכולים לקחת את הכסף שלכם ולשים אותו בפיקדון בבנק וממש ליהנות מזה.
והדיגש פה הוא על המילה תאורטית,
כי הבנקים לא העלו את הריביות על הפיקדונות באותו שיעור שבנק ישראל העלה את הריבית.
בנק ישראל העלה את הריבית שלו מ-0 ל-2, זה ממש הרבה.
הריביות על הפיקדונות העלו בפחות מזה.
יש לכם מושג מה הריבית שהבנק שלכם מציע על פיקדונות?
הריביות היחידות שהבנקים כן העלו באותו שיעור כמו בנק ישראל הן הריביות על ההלוואות,
מה שאומר שהמינוס שלכם מתייקר והמשכנתה שלכם מתייקרת וכל הלוואה אחרת שלקחתם.
וזה הטריק הגאוני של הבנקים.
כשהריבית במשק עולה,
הם מרוויחים
טונות של כסף בלי לעשות שום דבר.
בנק ישראל,
כשהחזירה את הקריטה מישראלית,
המשפט העליון המשפטי,
התפתחויות בפרסידנטיות,
במיוחד של הכנסת המשפטית, רון פול, טקסיס.
פול רנד פרסידנט ב-2008 ו-2012,
בפוקוס על חברות מלחמתי,
לתאר את העבודה ולהשיג את האנשים של הסיסטמטריה המשפטית.
הוא עודד בילס מבחינת ולהשיג את הסיסטמטריה המשפטית המשפטית המשפטית,
והוא רציג מאוד קצת מעין-שרים פוליטיקה.
זה גם היה בזמן המשפטי ברג'נין תיא-פארטי מובמנת בישראל.
אף פתיחות מעין-שרים מדיה הכי טובה לסיילנט את המשפטית של רון פול,
הוא היה אקסטרימנטי פופולר על קולגי קמפוסים ועם וטרינים שרזינתו עם סטנציה האנטי-חברית.
פול, In the Fed,
בילס על עבודה של ג'י אדוורד גריפן,
ובאתו את הכסף לגבי האינסטטריה המשפטית.
החוקים, קמפייסטים ומדינות פרסידנטיות ומדינות החליטו להודות את ג'נרטיה המשפטית המשפטית המשפטית המשפטית המשפטית המשפטית המשפטית.
לפני כמה שנים מאז 2010,
אקטיביסטים מעבור האוניברסיטה עשו מרצות ורלעות בבנקים רזרונות כלפי המדינות.
גם עבור הזמן,
האמריקאים היו במקום הראשון של ההצעה של 2008,
שהייתה גם נקראת בבנקים אותם.
אנשים כלפי המדינות היו נפגלים בשלטי החלטות של הבנקאים.
כשאנשים הלחשו את הבית והלבדים שלהם, הם התחלו לשאול את ההצעות.
בספטמבר 2011,
אקטיביסטים התחלו את המשפטי האקטיביסטים והמלחמות של זוכתי פארק.
בתוך חודש,
היו פרוטסטים מסוים שיאמרו בין מאותות מדינות מעולות מעולות מדינת ישראל ויותר מ-900 מדינות ב-82 מדינות.
האקטיביסטים בכל מדינות מעולות היו ניסיונות מסוימתות,
אבל לצדק, אנשים היו מפסדים על המידע והאיכות של המשחקים החיים על חייהם.
כמה פספציפית התחלו על העבודה של סוב-פריים,
שהפעלה ראשונה במיוחדת החינוך,
ומרים היו הרגים שהבנקים גדולים היו רואים כאילו גדולים לגבי
התחלת תחילת הכספים בקריסה.
כמה פספציפים גם פוקסו על ידי מחזקת הכספים מהפוליטיקה,
כשאחרים פוקסו על לאיינה ובניות עבודה ועבודה.
בכלל,
כשחודשים היו חלקות נוספות,
הם גם היו מבטיחות.
בעצם,
כמה חלקים מהמדינות האנד-הפד היו קבוצות קמפיינים ב-"Occify the Fed",
בנספים לספרים של אנשים לאקיפות האנד-פיישבות בחודש מכללות.
לפחות,
alliances between the T party and the Fed and Occupy crowds were rare.
As with many activist movements,
it wasn't long before the original messages of the T party and Occupy were watered down,
co-opted and eventually shut down.
In the case of Occupy,
all of the encampments around the world had been cleared from the parks by January 2012. The T party movement was quickly diluted and swallowed up by the mainstream Republican party,
and רון פאול's end-הFed movement mostly died with his failed second presidential run.
While there are still many people who support רון פאול and his call to end the Federal Reserve,
the issue has taken a back seat in the age of culture wars.
One of the most remarkable things of the past decade was witnessing the rise of Occupy Wall Street on one end of the
left-rata spectrum and end the Fed or the T party movement on the other side of the controlled-rata-rata.
And these two movements at the base, the core of what these two movements were and what
the original activists involved in those movements were advocating for were very similar in a lot of key respects.
these were not highly politically partisan movements at their base at the beginning.
They were quickly taken over and co-opted and deflected by the old political partisan hackes,
in order to deflect them from the core issue that was at the base of both. Occupy wall street and the Fed were both trying to target the banking system and the monetary system,
which became an issue that I think רון פאול acted as the lightning rod for that issue in the 2008
political election cycle in the United States.
But that was a recognition, especially during the time of the 2008 banking crisis, that there is something
fundamentally wrong with the system as it has been structured.
And that realization is truly one of the most
revolutionary potentialities that,
certainly in U.S. history,
but really in world history.
When the population starts to become highly interested in the monitoring question,
that is when things get very politically volatile.
We can look back to the popular movement at the late 19th, early 20th century in the United States, that was advocating for bיו-מדליזם,
recognizing that the gold standard that U.S. was on at that time was actually the cross of gold,
and William gennium's prine famous for formulation to which the public would be nailed.
And people were arguing, for example,
for free silver and this would be the way to open up the monetary base and so that
the average person who can't participate.
That kind of insight is truly revolutionary.
And that's why the populace of the term of the 20th century had to be denגרד.
And that's why the populace of the 21st century were quickly
derailed and basically snדled off into side issues.
So it is extremely important that the populace of the 21st century started out
fundamentally questioning the monetary base on which our society functions.
And obviously,
I don't think this is,
this takes much reasoning,
I think we can quickly understand exactly why the people in charge of this system would want to deflect people
from pursuing that avenue of inquiry.
The Federal Reserve System is the model for many of the central banks around the world today.
In fact, the vast majority of nations in the world operate within the central banking system.
פורנזיק היסטוריאן ריצ'רד גרוב
ס אלוסיך אתכם איך ראשוננו את המוספת הרצלות בנות בנס פסטרטיה בצורפות הצוות בצורפות בישראל,
ובכל זאת טווח שהמשלמו אתו דווחה בנושאים הקבוצות מצוות
לאונשיות הלאומיים, כתובות האינטרנטים,
בנס� הרציונות והבנושאים רבות הגדולות לאונשיות בשבילה.
ככל שהרציונות הזאת הגדולה לידיי בישראל.
אבל היום הצעה לבוקות אינטרנטיאלית הזוונה,
והם צריכים מלא הביתה החולה מלאות וגם השטח יותר גדולת.
The countries needed money too.
And so this group had figured it out,
they got this international banking,
I don't want to call it a cartel,
but it's a dynasty.
They closed down their, they started in Germany,
and they closed down their German office a couple years before World War I.
So during World War I,
no Roth shot, in fact, I don't think the bank open until later in the 20th century back in Germany.
So they kind of spread out,
and in the time that they spread out,
you had the immediate creation here in this country,
the Federal Reserve System,
and then around the time of World War II,
the Bank for International Settlements,
which was Montague Norman from the Bank of England,
and
Elmar Horsas Grelli Shackt,
who was Hitler's banker,
but he was born in Brooklyn.
That's the Bank for International Settlements in Switzerland.
And from there they created IMF, the World Bank,
but these are all creatures,
not just from Jacko Island,
these are creatures of Rhodes' last will and testament.
So the working groups, the media control, the financial control,
it's been conglomerated,
distilled and condensed over the last
120,
120 years, since World War II.
With the launch of the Breton wood system in 1944,
two organizations were created,
the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.
Off-out, these globalist organizations loaned out funds to impoverished or developing nations,
in the name of defeating poverty or exporting democracy.
However, as noted in the book Confessions of an Economic Hitman by John Perkins, these institutions often hand out loans to nations,
with the intent of seizing the natural resources and minerals if a nation cannot repay the debt.
The World Bank itself has been dominated by international bankers and members of the Roundtable groups,
including the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Trilateral Commission.
In the wake of World War I,
another powerful institution was created in Basel,
Switzerland,
the Bank for International Settlements,
the Central Bank of Central Banks.
The BIS was originally created to process the World War I,
רפריישים בגרמניה.
The BIS also helped provide liquidity to European governments during אינסטטיבילות.
אומנם ה-Federal Reserve לא נכנסה את ה-BIS עד 1994,
כש-2022, 63 Central Banks היו נכנסה.
In the book,
The Tower of Basel,
the shadowy history of the secret bank that runs the world,
British Journalist,
אדם לבור,
outlines the history of corruption and scandal at the heart of the BIS.
לבור דוטלס,
how the BIS had countries assigned their gold reserves to BIS accountants.
The BIS would also process payments between countries.
This made the BIS an ATM for many nations,
including Hitler's Germany during World War II.
לבור outlines how the BIS helped process payments for Hitler,
which allowed the third right to flourish and finance its war efforts.
לבור also examines את הקולבות בין סוויסטים לבינסטים לבינסטים סוויסטים ונאצים במקומותיו האחרונות האחרונות האחרונות האחרונות ה-S
. The BIS is also essentially immune from all banking regulation and international laws.
It is seen as an independent financial entity for סנטיאל בנקרס,
run by סנטיאל בנקרס,
and virtually self-governing.
Due to the BIS being located in Switzerland,
it is also protected by the secretive Swiss banking law.
We don't have the space in this format to fully expand upon the tangled web of history,
weaved by the IMF,
the World Bank and the BIS.
However,
it is crucial to understand the role played by national central banks,
as well as the impact of the international banking institutions.
This is even more important as we shipped into the age of digital currency and new powerful instruments.
Central Bank Digital Bank Central Bank Central Central. As banking and finance have become increasingly digitized,
new ways of banking are being dreamt up.
One of these tools,
which will become more familiar in the coming years,
is an abstract,
unassuming,
instrumental instrumental,
which has the potential to be an unseen force which coercessed people to act in ways which
serve the system rather than their own interests.
The terms social impact finance, social impact bonds,
social impact investing,
pay for success,
or simply impact investing,
describe a specific investment strategy that claims to focus on the benefiting society or the environment in a positive way,
in addition to reaping financial gains.
A social impact bond is a contract with the public sector or governing body in which
the institution pays for better social outcomes and passes on the savings to social impact investors.
In this way,
social impact bonds are not traditional bonds,
since repayment and return on investment are dependent on achieving a desired social outcome.
אם the investors and institutions fail to achieve set outcomes,
they receive neither a return or a repayment of the principle investment.
These types of investment these are part of a growing trend where corporations seeking to rebrand themself,
spend large amounts of money to prove their efforts.
In this way,
companies can claim to be expanding their social responsibility
and increase their involvement in the community and social issues.
One specific method for measuring the success of these programs is to base them on environmental,
social and governance criteria.
This so called ESG investing is also sometimes referred to as sustainable investing,
רספונסבל investing,
או סוציאלי רספונסבל investing.
The practice has become an increasingly popular way to promote the United Nation's sustainable development goals.
However, there are major concerns about how this sort of scheme could play out.
Let's imagine if a social impact investor actually wanted to bet that elementary children will fail and not achieve higher grades.
In that situation,
an investor might be incentivized to discourage positive outcomes and instead
to seek a profit by encouraging negative outcomes.
If this sounds preposterous,
remember that in the years leading up to the 2008 financial crisis,
investors were using financial tools to make profits off
of the losses and bankruptcy of individual home owners.
Freddie Mac
prevented households from being able to take advantage of today's mortgage rates and then bet on it.
סקפטיקים ל-social אימפקט investing fear that these tools could remain invisible to most people while directly affecting their lives.
When combined with social credit scores,
social impact finance could lead to a dystopian world where
big uncontPs and אזורים יכולים עמודים וסטיינים משחקים עובדים מבטים.
זה יכול גם לראות את הסיסטם שבו אלה על המערכת המערכות האחרות אחרות בסדרות נהיה
מתפקדים או שתי הגנות לידי סיסטיקה של החיי המערכתי.
בישראל הרחובה בשיעורים המינות פשוט לאימה לבית המינות נתניה הרבה מאוד אינטוריות למקורות בסיסטור האנטורית יותר נורדות,
או CBDC.
הטכנולוגיה עכשיו טומניות בתזמות של זמן,
אבל מה שאני חושב שזה כבר בכלל שחלק מהחברה
around the world have announced their support for some form of digital currency to be issued by the central banks of each nation.
these CBDCs would be held in a digital wallet by every citizen of the nation.
The details and specifics will differ nation to nation,
but ultimately,
it will involve the elimination of the use of cash and the implementation of a digital currency system where the government is capable of monitoring every transaction.
It's important to note that while many of these projects will likely use blockchain technology in one capacity or another,
they are not crypto currencies.
The major difference between the two being a focus on decentralization and privacy,
which were essential concepts in the early days of crypto currencies like Bitcoin.
In late 2021,
Agustin Carstens,
General Manager of the Bank for International Settlements,
began speaking in favour of the use of digital currencies,
stating that central banks should take advantage of the efficiency of digital currencies.
coming from the General Manager of the Central Bank of Central Banks,
that's a pretty big endorsement.
And shortly after Carstן's statements on efficiency,
the BIS and the Central Banks of Australia,
Malaysia,
סינגפור,
and סאנט-אפריקה,
agreed to test the use of digital currencies for cross-border transactions.
The BIS Innovation Hub say they are attempting to develop,
shared platforms,
for cross-border transactions using multiple central-בנק דיגיטל קורנציות.
In a 2020 talk titled Cross-Border
A Vision for the Future,
Carstens gave a peek behind the curtain,
detailing exactly how the bankers see CBDCs being used.
We don't know, for example, who is using a 100 dollar bill today,
we don't know who is using a 1,000 person bill today.
The key difference with CBDC is that the Central Bank
will have absolutely control over the rules and regulations that will determine the use of that
expression of Central Bank liability and also we will have the technology to enforce it.
Carstens view CBDCs as a tool for eliminating privacy and for Central Bankers to force citizens to use currency exactly when,
where and how they are told.
This is the next stage and the bankers plot to dominate and profit off of all facets of society.
While what we have described here may seem fantastic or unbelievable,
rest assured the bankers have infected all aspects of our world.
Even if you are not ready to see the Central Bank digital currency staring you in the face,
we have more than enough evidence of the criminal acts of the banking class.
The banks have profited from or funded drug trafficking and countless bloody conflicts around the world.
HSBC has been implicated in allowing drug cartels to pour money into their banks.
Wacovia and Bank of America have also been linked to money laundering for drug cartels.
Whichever angle you choose to look at the situation from the banking cartels,
the banking cartel has clearly had an overwhelmingly negative impact on the planet.
Not to mention that the people running these banks clearly have ulterior motives and plans,
which are guidinging their decisionים.
What can we do to break away from the chains of the banks and the families who run them?
Solution What can we do to break free from the clutches of the nearly all-pervasive banking system?
Is it even possible to live a normal life without participating in the banking system?
For starters,
it is absolutely possible to live a fulfilling life without submittinging to the banks.
The reality is that if we continue to use the banks,
we are condoning their actions by participating in their corrupted system.
If we aim to live in line with our values and principles,
then we ought to support institutions which align with our values and boycott those that do not.
Not only is it important to boycott the banks on principle,
it's also necessary because participating in the bank systems also supports other projects you might not to prove up.
For example,
with fractional reserve banking,
you deposit 1,000 dollars into your bank and they only hold a fraction,
say 10%,
and the rest they invest in all kinds of projects.
This could be surveillance projects, pipelines on indigenous lands,
or partnering with the foundations and NGOs on the various schemes.
The point is, you have no say in how your money is used.
If you want to have a say in how your money is spent and you need to use a financial institution,
try to start with the credit union or a building society.
Typically, these organizations are locally focused and customers are members who can vote how funds are used.
For those who are ready to abandon the banking system all together,
research the boycott and divest from the bank movements.
In the years, since the Occupy movement launched,
activist organizations have launched coordinated divest campaigns with hundreds of people closing their bank accounts at once.
This might not be easy for everyone and it might involve making some changes
in your life to meet the logistical challenges,
but it is possible.
We should take note of how difficult it is become to live a life without a bank account or a credit card.
If you are looking for ways to get off the fiat currencies of government,
then study alternatives,
like private crypto currencies or precious metals like gold and silver.
As noted earlier,
there is a distinct difference between privacy coins like Monero and CBDAC.
Crypto-קורנציות הן לא יכולות הן פנאסיה,
אבל עד היום הן משותף לטרנזק את value
anywhere in the world nearly instantaneously without banks or governments.
finelly,
כך, as the concept of money and currency evolves,
it might be time for communities to pursue the creation of new currencies all together.
This could be digital in the form of a crypto token,
or it could even be a physical currency backed by a commodity.
Local freedom sales could create currencies that could be traded within an emerging alternative economy.
The point is that we need new forms of exchange value
and trading goods that are not dependent on or supportive of the bankers.
breaking free of the financial prison they are attempting to erect is absolutely necessary if we wish to see the end of the piramית of power.
כדי ללמוד יותר על הקארטל הבנקים,
אנחנו מבקשים ללמודות ללמודות את רותשילדים הפיננציאליים של ג'ון ריבס
The World's Banker,
ההיסטוריה של רותשילד של מיאל פרגוסון
הקריטור מג'קו איילנד,
a second look at the Federal Reserve
ביי ג'י אדוורד גריפן,
טאוור אוף באזל,
היסטוריה הקטעית של רותשת המחקרות המחקרות
ביי אדם ליבור
we also recommend
לראות את רותשילת המחקרות של ג'יימס קורבט.
![מיקס קליפים [2024]](/storage/thumb/videos/V018106_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2023]](/storage/thumb/videos/V017157_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2020] - עם כתוביות באנגלית](/storage/thumb/videos/V016615_150.jpg)
![חוזרים בעבר - מיקס - חלק 2 [3:30 שעות!]](/storage/thumb/videos/V015619_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2022] 3 שעות!](/storage/thumb/videos/V015525_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2021] - עם כתוביות באנגלית](/storage/thumb/videos/V014960_150.jpg)
![הכל יודוך | הרב אמנון יצחק [שיר]](/storage/thumb/videos/V015560_150.jpg)
![ושמחת בימיך | הרב אמנון יצחק [שיר]](/storage/thumb/videos/V015558_150.jpg)
![מחרוזת שירי קפ"ז | הרב אמנון יצחק [שיר]](/storage/thumb/videos/V014860_150.jpg)
![[שיר] נאד נפוח • ביצוע: הרב אמנון יצחק](/storage/thumb/videos/V014415_150.jpg)
