חדשות וירוס TV - מהדורה 696 • איך זה עובד? - חלק ב' • 02-04-2023
- - - לא מוגה! - - -
בושה, בושה, בושה, בושה, בושה, בושה, בושה, בושה.
אפשר להעריך שאם ראש הממשלה היה מבין למה תגרום ההחלטה לפטר את שר הביטחון,
הוא כנראה היה פועל אחר.
אנשים ישבו בבית וצפו בתדהמה איך נאמרים לא רק על החופש שלהם, אלא גם מוצא.
ההחלטה לפטר שר ביטחון כי תיאר את המצב, את הסכנות,
ובגלל דרישתו לעצור את החקיקה,
גרמה למראות שלא נראו כאן מעולם.
ראיתם החדשות שהוא פוטר את גלנט?
אין יותר דיקטטורה מזה, אנחנו צעד אחד מלהיות הונגריה.
כולם הגיעו לפה בצורה ספונטנית.
אף איראני לא משלם לנו גליל דיסטל, אף גרמני לא משלם לנו,
אף אמריקאי, אין אף אחד מאחורי כמדינה מעורבת.
זה העם, העם רוצה דמוקרטיה ואנחנו נלחם עליה כל מה שדרוש כדי שאנחנו נמשיך להישאר דמוקרטיה.
הם ממוקלות להישאר דמוקרטיה ולכך שבת פעם,
ממוקלות להתחיל במצב האנגס היהודי של האנגס.
למשל,
בתאר הממוקל בלי הטבע והעליון מלהיות הווירוס,
הקולות להסיים עם גופי מיוחדות והאנגסות.
מי הם להתחיל עם גופייהם וכדומה הדמוקרטיים?
אף פעם, בדרך כלל, אם ההצבעה הזוידה מסתובבת המדינה ממוקלות,
ממוקלות הסביבות ומסטרטגיהה לתושב את זה,
אז יש ממוויכה בכללותה לבושבים בעצמאות
No matter how absurd this narrative is, simply because in this way people feel that they can control their anxiety. They feel that they have something to direct the frustration and the aggression on. So that's the first extremely important step. And then follows the second one, which is the really dangerous step.
Because so many people participate at the same time in the strategy to do with the object of anxiety,
they feel connected again.
Yes.
It is as if their loneliness is a peer, they feel full of solidarity.
And that's the point, they have the feeling that the fight is a collective heroic battle with the virus and they will consider everyone who doesn't go along with them as an egoist,
as a man who lacks all solidarity.
And that's in itself the strange thing is you could say well what's the problem?
People fell lonely and now they feel connected again. So what's the problem? But there is a problem.
Because a mass is a group that has formed not because people connect with each other.
A mass is a group that has formed because each individual separately connects to the collective,
meaning that the famous solidarity of the masses is never a solidarity with other individuals, right?
It's a solidarity with the collective.
And the longer the mass transformation exists,
the more everyone demands,
that everyone sacrifice all his personal interests for the collective.
And that's exactly the reason why in the corona crisis, for instance,
everyone was talking about solidarity.
And at the same time,
we accepted that if someone got an accident on the street,
we were no longer allowed to help him.
At the same time, we accepted that if our father or mother,
our parents were dying somewhere in a nursing home,
that we were no longer allowed to visit them.
So it was all.
Everyone had to sacrifice everything
for the sake of the collective.
So massformation is extreme collectיבism.
It's extreme collectיבism. It's the balance between individualism and collectיבism
that goes completely in the direction.
But there's no actually, I mean, but at the same time, the people who encourage it
discourage the formation of individual relationships between people.
So the government in this country, the Biden administration was encouraging children to turn in their parents to law enforcement if they said something that deviated from the
from the corona narrative online.
So they're breaking apart solidarity between people.
of course, of course, that is always a feature of it.
The strange thing is that this happens spontaneously in every group which has an extremely strong group identity,
all the energy will be sucked away from the bonds between the individuals.
For example, in a military commando,
if they have to do something dangerous, they will typically demand that there are no sexual relationships between the members of the group. Right. Simply, because this relationship between the members, this strong relationship that could threaten to the group. Right. In a dangerous situation. Right.
these members could choose for each other instead of for the group. So that happens in every group, with a very strong group identity.
ספונטניות,
ובשבילות.
To an extreme extent, in a mass, all solidarity, all love between the individuals is sucked away,
and it's all injected in the love between the individual and the collective. And that's why in the end,
even the strongest בונד,
the בונד בין המדינה לבינת המדינה,
completely unpoוויד.
And even mothers report their sons to the state and get them gilts if they feel that they are not plווייל enough to the state.
So it's natural, natural.
It's a psychological process that is very logical,
but that is extremely dangerous.
And that's exactly why we have to try to understand it, and we have to try to understand what we can do about it.
So, what we can do about it?
First of all, the hair on my arms are standing up because you've so precisely described what we've all just seen,
I mean, precisely.
Because it's sound like this is a feature of human nature.
People are this way always.
Can you think about examples where mass formation was stopped before it became
totalitarianism by a small group of people standing up and saying no.
Oh, definitely, definitely.
You know,
the first totalitarian systems in history were the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany.
In the first half of the 20th century.
But there were trends towards totalitarianization in several places in the world, and in most places they stopped.
Well, all through Europe.
Yeah, yeah. They stopped. And the problem in the Soviet Union and in Nazi Germany was.
That the resistance at a certain moment
decided to go underground and to stop speaking out in public space.
That happened in 1930 in the Soviet Union and around 1935 in Nazi Germany.
And within six months in both countries,
the destruction campaign started.
Within six months, the destruction campaign started.
So there is a
a perfect correlation between the resistance
that stops to speak out and the start of the atrocities and cruelities in the country.
Simply because, if you understand the mechanism, then you know that transformation is a kind of hypnosis.
It's identical.
It's exactly the same.
In a hypnotic procedure there is someone, a hypnotist,
who focuses the attention of someone else on one aspect of reality.
For instance, an object that is swinging on a chain or something.
And once the attention is focused on that one aspect of reality,
all the rest of reality disappears. All the rest of reality,
it is as if the rest of reality doesn't exist anymore.
And this mechanism is extremely strong.
You can,
a simple hypnotic procedure sufficient to focus on one attention so much on one aspect of reality,
that the person won't notice anymore that there is a surgeon who cuts through the skin,
through the flash, to flash even straight through the breastbone,
to perform in open heart operation.
That happens all the time in the University Hospital in Belgium.
There is a professor,
it is a בת-פיין מוביל, who uses this simple procedure to focus on the patient's attention
on something, and then the surgeon can
do no matter what he wants to cut through the breastbone,
the patient won't notice it.
So that's the power of this mechanism, of the focus of attention.
Exactly the same happens in the massformation.
First,
people start to deal with all kinds of emotions that are no longer coupled to mental representation.
And then all these emotions, all these anxieties,
are focused on one point,
and consequently,
the people don't notice anymore that they lose everything,
that they lose their health,
their wealth,
the future of their children,
and so on.
That's exactly what happens in a massfirmation.
So once you understand that the mechanism of massfirmation is a kind of hypnosis,
you understand that it is a phenomenon that is always provoked by the voice of someone,
the leaders of the masses who use endוקטריניation and propaganda to continue the massfirmation.
And then you also understand
that if you want to disturb the massfirmation,
that you have to continue to speak out, that the dissonant voices have to continue to speak out.
If the dissonant voices, if the people who do not go along with the masses,
continue to speak out,
they won't succeed in waking up the masses.
לפעמים מישהו יבוא ולבדוק,
אבל לפעמים אנשים יבוא ולבדוקר יהיו עכשיו להיות בגריפות של המספימשלה,
אבל זה לא אומר שזו אמורה שלא תהיה איזה אפקט.
לא כל כך.
זו אמורה שלא תהיה לישראל את ההיפנושא לגבי איזשהו קצת,
וזה יאמן את ההיפנושא לתת כלשהו תהיה כלשהו,
שהאנשים יבואו קונבנסים שהם צריכים לדיסוח את כל מישהו שאינם לא יעבו עםיהם.
From the 19th century onwards, scholars like Gustave לבון have described that, that the people who are not in the grip of the massfirmation have
that their speech has exactly this effect.
It doesn't take them up,
but it disturbs the massfirmation and it makes sure
that it doesn't go so deep that the masses start to commit atrocities.
And in this way, that's from an estrategical point of view,
quintessential,
in this way,
what will happen is the following.
The masses are always self-destructive and they will slowly exhaust themselves.
They will exhaust themselves and destroy themselves before they destroyed the people who do not go along with them.
So once you understand that, you understand that the first and foremost
the strategic principle that you have to follow is that you have to continue to speak out,
and at the same time it's also an ethical principle.
As a human being. Yes, this is an ethical principle. As a human being, you have the ethical duty
to articulate these words that seem sincere and honest to you,
no matter what the consequences are.
And if you do that, we have numerous examples that's described by סולצינצ'ין,
by the Primo-לוואי,
by the Vigטור פליינקו.
If you do that,
something wonderful will happen.
If you stick to your technical principles,
when the world de-humanize,
you go through a very fast process of mental evolution.
A very fast process of mental evolution as a human being.
You start to become stronger and stronger and stronger as a human being at the mental level,
and sometimes even at the physical level,
if you read את סולצוניצ'ן,
he gives this wonderful examples of how in the gולaks,
most people started to act in a beast-like manner.
Yes.
But there were some, a small minority,
who went in exactly the opposite direction,
who, in this full of darkness, chose to try to represent humanity and who became more and more determined to stick under all conditions, no matter how difficult it was,
to the ethical principles.
And סולצינצ'ין gives these wonderful examples
in which he describes how these people very often survived the concentration camps and became even stronger while most others died,
within a few weeks or a few months.
of course, that's not a guarantee.
But I think that
if we understand that,
we understand that the process of massformation and everything that happens now,
in a certain way, has meaning and purpose.
It should motivate us
to understand the value of ethical principles for a human being.
It should make us more determined to continue to live according to ethical principles,
while the rest of the world leaves them behind.
Let me just say,
one of the most amazing conversations I've ever had,
and I'm so grateful that you're right. I mean that. I'm grateful that you're here. I feel like you're speaking directly to our country.
What is the difference between the people who go along,
which is the majority, it sounds like,
and the smaller percentage who decide, no,
I'm going to say what I believe is true no matter what.
What makes people to decide to take one path or the other?
And can't you predict it ahead of time?
No,
you can't.
From the 19th century onwards,
from the moment,
the psychologyists have been studying the phenomenon of massformation, it has been re-marked and observed time and time again, that every time a mass emerges in a society, there is a small group who doesn't go along with it.
But the small group is extremely diverse and heterogeneous.
Yes. And nobody seems to know what connects these people, I've noticed, which characteristic these people share.
But in one way or another, they all make this
fundamental decision, a decision that cannot be reduced to anything else.
They make this decision to choose for truth speech,
instead of choosing the easy way and going along with the narrative that everybody believes in, but which,
of which everybody actually knows that it is utterly absurd and magical.
So because the massformation, you know,
that's very interesting, the reason why people buy into the narrative that leads to massformation is not because they think that the narrative is correct,
not at all.
The reason why they buy into the narrative is because it leads to this new social bomb,
because it makes them feel connected again,
because loneliness is the most painful state, we don't know it,
but it is like that, we don't realize it,
but it is like that, for the human being. And it wants to escape it, it wants this new social bomb.
And the reason why people buy into it is because it leads to all these psychological advantages.
It gives, it couple the anxiety to an object, it provides an object
at which people can direct their frustration and aggression.
It, it leads to this new connectedness, so that's the reason,
this new social bomb and the effective advantages is the reason why people continue to go along with the narrative,
no matter how absurd it is because.
He could even say more,
it's just the same like people in a football stadium,
all sing the same song, not because they think it's the most beautiful song in the world,
no, it's because the song
connects them with the other people.
And so,
and you could even say more,
the more absurd
the measures become, for instance, the corona measures,
the more they will be applauded by this part of the population that is really in the grip of the mass
simply because the measures have the function of a ritual.
And what is a ritual?
Ritualistic behavior is always behavior that has no pragmatic meaning and that demand is a sacrifice from the individual.
A sacrifice through which the individual shows
that the collective is more important than itself.
So people, without knowing it,
we live in a time in which we think the materialist-fewan man in the world believes that rituals have no meaning and no function,
but they are essential for us,
and in totalitarianism, without knowing it,
people engage completely in ritualism, but they don't realize it.
And these rituals are rituals of death.
People sacrifice, blindly sacrifice everything,
just to escape their profound feeling of social atomization,
to escape their profound feeling of lonelyness and disconnection.
It's a kind of suicidal ritual that is committed, and that's exactly why
many many many people expected that if the rituals became, if the corona
תהיה more absurd, that people would start to wake up.
But that's usually didn't happen.
No.
No.
Simply because people don't understand that unconsciously these measures have the function of a ritual.
And the more absurd they are the pure, they they they they fulfill the function of a ritual.
That's exactly right. The more unlikely, the more compelling.
No, ended.
-תודה רבה.
![מיקס קליפים [2024]](/storage/thumb/videos/V018106_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2023]](/storage/thumb/videos/V017157_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2020] - עם כתוביות באנגלית](/storage/thumb/videos/V016615_150.jpg)
![חוזרים בעבר - מיקס - חלק 2 [3:30 שעות!]](/storage/thumb/videos/V015619_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2022] 3 שעות!](/storage/thumb/videos/V015525_150.jpg)
![מיקס קליפים [2021] - עם כתוביות באנגלית](/storage/thumb/videos/V014960_150.jpg)
![הכל יודוך | הרב אמנון יצחק [שיר]](/storage/thumb/videos/V015560_150.jpg)
![ושמחת בימיך | הרב אמנון יצחק [שיר]](/storage/thumb/videos/V015558_150.jpg)
![מחרוזת שירי קפ"ז | הרב אמנון יצחק [שיר]](/storage/thumb/videos/V014860_150.jpg)
![[שיר] נאד נפוח • ביצוע: הרב אמנון יצחק](/storage/thumb/videos/V014415_150.jpg)
