חדשות וירוס TV - מהדורה 659 • מדיה ממש לא חברתית - חלק א' • 08-02-2023
- - - לא מוגה! - - -
בבקשה.
To the heart of darkness, it's the father of all lies. If you understand this,
then when you look at it,
you can try and fathom out what is actually going on and what the next move is.
It is difficult, mind you, as what has happened over the last three years,
I believe it is the biggest psychological operation on the masses that has ever been staged,
and it is difficult to conceive the depths of the trickery involved.
One thing we have seen is recently numerous reports of viruses.
We had the monkey pox,
which was all over the media for a short time,
now forgotten the strap-a thing.
Again, it was pushed,
but then forgotten about.
Then just after Christmas, we had this crackan krapולה,
which again, it doesn't seem to be going anywhere.
And this report in the sun is like a fishing exercise,
because I think for these things to take off, first of all, they have to engage the public. The public have to be engaged in it.
The public have to believe what they are being told.
And once they become afraid, then it all snowball.
But it's not working.
And it seems that they have underestimated their control.
These propaganda סי-אופס,
are being kind of ignored by the public, because either they're completely fed up with it and just can't be bothered anymore,
or, hopefully, they're starting to see through it. And this article, in the way it's written,
shows you this.
Field of strain,
and the Kraken variant most likely to take over as a nervous strain,
אופרוס raises fears.
Health chiefs warn.
All right, yeah, the old Health Chiefs is warning us again, yet again.
So boring.
The Kraken COVID variant is likely to take over and become dominant in the UK,
but it's not yet a variant of concern,
the experts have said today.
This is all ב...
right?
The reason it hasn't become a variant of concern is because of the public,
the masses, not buying into this crap and they know this because they measure the interaction online and analyze people's responses and comments to social media posts,
and they can tell people that they just not engaged or triggered to fall in line for their new Theer Propaganda.
That is why it isn't a variant of concern.
It says here there is another variant called CH11, which is labeled as Aות'רוס.
What is Aות'רוס?
It turns out it's a two-headed serpent-tailed dog from Greek mythology.
Oh, it's another monster.
Oh, I'm scared.
All these monsters.
It then says the Kraken nickname was given to the variant by Twitter users.
It then says the name appears to have first been suggested on Twitter by
the evolutionary evolutionaryist. Professor T.R.R.R.R.I.G.A.R.
Who is this? I don't know.
But this is getting a free plug in the fake stream media.
This one must be part of the system, right?
And then we get to the key part, yeah?
They have a survey in the article.
They want to know how you are afraid. They want to know how you are afraid from this or the publica or
of this invisible thing that we have made up.
How afraid are you of it?
And the reason they're asking it is because they want to push ahead with their propaganda,
but they don't believe the masses are going to go along with it.
Because there must be a majority of them who couldn't care less any more.
They ask in the survey, they say,
are you worried about the new strain of COVID?
And there are four possible answers for you to choose.
Here they are.
One,
Yes, I'll be being more careful.
2. No, I'm vaccinated.
3. No,
but I do have a vulnerable family.
4. Maybe, I'm not sure yet, right?
Maybe,
maybe I might be worried about the Kraken monster and a new two-headed dog with a serpent tail monster virus,
but I'm not sure yet.
I'm not really convinced yet.
The fear factor is not high enough yet.
Maybe you could stage some event or something.
Maybe get some actors to film themself coughing in hospitals or something.
You know,
because you know,
I'm not sure yet. I'm not sufficiently scared enough yet to fall for a new round of fear propaganda, to get me to mask up and line up to get an experimental devil juice chat.
Yeah, that's your survey.
Maybe, maybe I'm worried, I'm not sure.
You know, there's not an answer, like,
get lost. You lie in Decepticon further of all lies, media bullshit.
No, there is no answer like that in the survey.
Oh, no.
It's interesting,
what we could be seeing here are the... I mean,
are these Decepticons,
are they weighing up which way to go at the moment?
are they going to go full-on big review,
or are they going to try and push another
Kraken serpent serpent tailed two-headed dog monster onto the public.
But they're testing this concept out and they're asking for surveys,
are you worried enough?
are you scared enough?
Because they're not convinced that the masses are going to fool for it.
That's why you see surveys and questions like this.
So anyway, look, just a quick video,
תודה רבה.
Hello,
I'm James Corporate of the Corporate Report and I'm not here right now.
I mean, there,
with you.
Confused?
We'll take a look at this.
see?
But in truth,
I'm not here either.
What you are watching are the ghostly reflections of someone far away.
I am not in the room with you,
but you can see me.
You can't hear me.
You might not think much about this,
but
it is one of the wonders of our era and it is shaped to the world in ways that we can barely comprehend.
Media
It surrounds us.
We live our lives in it and through it.
We structure our lives around it.
But it wasn't always this way.
So how did we get here?
And where is the media technology that increasingly governs our lives taking us?
This is the story of the Media Matrix.
There is a story. There is a story about the famous battle of Waterloo in 1815 that is not usually included in the history textbooks.
The story is that John רוורת,
a trusted employee of Nathan Rothschild,
the English air of the infamous Rothschild,
רותשיילד בנקים חברי הכנסת.
It was at the battlefield that day,
and when the battle was decided and it was apparent that Napoleon had been defeated,
he raced off on horseback,
ביירות את הדברים עקרונות בשנת האנגלית.
The messenger arrived at his employer's London office a full 24
hours before the official government career,
and רותשילד,
always looking for a way to turn a profit,
decided to use the news to his advantage.
He made a show of selling his shares at the London Stock Exchange,
and the public,
believing the famed Stockbrookר,
had received word that Napoleon had won the battle,
began selling as well.
The stock market plummeted,
and Rothschild secretly brought up the shares at rock bottom prices.
By the time the news finally reached the Londoners that wellington,
not Napoleon,
was the victor at Waterloo,
the coup was complete.
ניתן רותשילד was the richest man in the realm.
This story,
כמו כל מיני היסטוריקל הדברים,
has been much decorated in the retelling.
ג'ון רוורת לא היה בווטרלו,
לדבר אחד,
ולא היה איזה מרקע מרקע מיוחד בשעה הראשונה לפני שהקריאה היחידה היחידית לנדון.
אבל החלק מהקריאה היחידה היא נכונה.
ניתן רותשילד היה לקרוא קריאה קריאה ראשונה של נפוליאן
החלטה ושהוא עושה טובה בנושא הזה,
כפי רוורת העמידה ביחד בשעה לפני האינסיטנט.
But whatever this story tells us about the world of finance,
it tells us something more fundamental,
about something far more important.
Power.
Knowledge is power,
and as we saw in part one of this series,
גודנברג had brought that power to the masses.
With the printing press,
knowledge could be copied and spread to the far corners of the globe faster and easier and cheaper than it ever had before,
but it still had to be carried.
On horseback,
on foot,
by train,
by carrier pigeon.
Information was still a physical thing and even the news of Napoleon's to feed at Waterloo had to be physically transported from one place to another.
But did it have to be this way?
What if information could be communicated directly by electric current and sent across wires or through the air at the speed of light?
Enter Samuel Mורס.
Mורס היה לא סיימנטיסט או אקספרימנטר, אבל פענטר.
הוא אמר שהאינטרס להביא את הנושא של משאירות אלקטריאליות
הגיעה להם בנושא של משאירות אלקטריאליות על ידי השיפ-גרם מאירופה לאמריקה ב-1932,
וכן הוא היה הבנה כאילו כאנשי משאירות הטלגרף.
In reality,
התחתור על הטלגליות האלה נכנסו לפני כמעט בעוד שעה.
האינטרס להביא את הנושא של משאירות אלקטריאליות בשקטוריות אלקטריאליות במשאירות
1753,
וזה היה דמיון כמה פעמים מעולה בשביל הכנסת,
הכי מזכירה בפרנסיסקו סלווה,
שב-1995 קיבלו את הנושאים לטסט-אנושאים של האנטרסטים,
השכירו את הנושא והם אינסטרקטו אותם ואינסטרקטו אותם לשאול את הנושאות של המשאירות האלה כשהם נכנסו לשוק.
במיוחד של ההיסטוריה,
מורס היה לוודא על ידי סיימנטיסטים ואינבנטרים שלו במיוחד שלו,
כמו פרופ' לנארד גייל,
who helped develop the technique of using relays to help the messages travel further than a few hundred yards,
and אלפרד וייל,
a bright young machine-ist,
who's improvements to morse's crude prototype brought the idea into reality.
Many even contend that it was וייל,
not morse,
who invented the system of dots and dashes that we know as morse code.
Nonetheless,
history is written by the winners,
and morse proved to be the winner.
Getting the credit, the glory and more to the point,
the patent for the telegraph,
מורס received a congressional appropriation of 30,000 dollars
to build the first telegraph line from Washington to Baltimore in 1944. He sent the first official telegraph message from the U.S. Capital to Elferד Vail at a railroad station in Baltimore.
The message had been selected by Ann Ellsworth,
the daughter of the patent commissioner,
with whom מורס was lodging while he was stationed in Washington.
She chose a passage from the Bible fitting of the momentous occasion.
What hath God רות?
The passage from the Book of Numbers is one of praise,
rejoicing at the wonders that God had רות for Israel and ends with an exclamation mark.
But the telegraph message didn't contain punctuation and so the press
report reported the phrase with a question mark at the end.
What hath God רות?
The medium had already begun to change the message.
It's difficult for us to appreciate just how incredible it was for those who first witnessed communication from a distance with a disembodied electric ghost.
In fact,
it was almost impossible for people to understand this type of communication in anything but spiritual terms.
Even the word, medium,
אבוקס the spectre of contact with the spirit world.
When the radio was introduced to Saudi Arabia,
the country's conservative Islamic lyrics declared it the devil hiding in a box and demanded
that King Abdul-עזיז banned the infernal contrapשion.
The King saw the potential use of the radio for the development of the country,
but relying on the clerics for support,
he couldn't outright reject the council.
In�ד, the crafty monarch proposed a test.
The radio would be brought before him the next day and he would listen to it himself.
If what the cleric said was true,
then he would ban the devil's device and beheaded those responsible for bringing it into the country.
The next day,
the radio was brought before the king at the appointed time,
but the king had secretly arranged with the radio engineers to make sure the Quran was being read at the hour of the test.
בטח כך,
כאשר הוא התחזור את זה,
היו פסגות מהקוראים מהקוראים היו להם.
Can it be that the devil is saying את הקוראים?
הוא שאלה.
או אם זה אולי נכון שזו לא חלק זו אצבעה?
The clerics הצליחו לבחור,
והרדיו התפתחו לסעודי ערביה.
אנחנו יכולים לך
אבל הסעודים לא היו הראשונים,
או האחרונים,
להחזיר את הטכנולוגיה המדעית.
In 1449,
יוהאן פוסט,
הציון של חברות ומתן מלאות ומתן מיוחד,
לנת גודנברג גודנברג נכון להתחיל לקרות את התכוונתו שלו,
וכשהוא נכון מהפרינטר כשהוא לא יכול לעשות לרפיית את התכוונות.
כאשר פוסט אחר נכון על השטרות של פריס,
מוצבים מולטיפול קופייה של גודנברג,
פריזי,
מי שמעתם כבר לא ראוי כתובות כבר וכך לא יכול ללכת
כאילו כאלה קופיות קופות כלכליות לאומיות קופות של המנוסקריפט יכולה להיות רצח כזאת,
הרסמו אותם על מצביעי דמוקרט.
האסנס של המדיאללה,
את ההשכילה לפרויקט את האישות של אנשים שלא יהיו,
במשות אלקטרוני ונתנדבלסות,
היא האסנס של מדיאללה,
משותפים לחזרה ומירות פלנטיארות של החור.
אבל האם הטכנולוגיה הזאת אוהבת
Art,
or can it's powers be used for good?