חדשות וירוס TV - מהדורה 603 • סודות הנפט: הטכנוקראטים - חלק א' • 21-11-2022
- - - לא מוגה! - - -
Today,
מריאן קינג-הוברט,
היותר ככה כמחלקי השל-אויל המסגרת ב-1950,
לבנות שה-U.S. תעבור את הפרוטוקציה של הפטרוליום ב-1970,
ושמעט בכל מיני כל מיני ספציה של הפרוטוקציה של הפרוטוקציה יצטרכו ב-2020.
התיאורי הפרוטוקציה הזאת,
שעוד פעם ראוי להוביל כהוברטס,
היה,
כמו כלכל האחרון הגנב בביג-אויל,
מובנה קראתי מיוחד,
התחייבו להביטות את המקום לארטיפיסלות
ולמסגרות את הפרוטוקציה הרבה גדולה.
הפרוטוקציה הודיתה לא חושבת על כל אמפריקה של כל מיני אייל,
אבל במקום הוא ראוי על הפרוטס לאומי הודית על הודיתו של רצינות רצינות רצינות,
והעשו את הכסף ההוריסטי לתת מודל פרוטוקציה.
כמו שהפרוטג' וכל מיג של אייל,
קנת דפייז,
נסעים לפני כך,
The numerical methods that Hubbard used to make his prediction are not crystal clear.
Today,
44 years later,
my guess is that Hubbard,
like everyone else,
reached his conclusion first and then searched for raw data and methods to support his conclusion.
קודם כאן לפני הלכה,
ב-1989,
Hubbard himself admited that when he showed his peak oil paper to the self-managing director before presenting it to his colleagues,
הדירקטורי הצליחו שלו לא לנסות מעברות עם ההסטמת של רזירות גבוהות,
פוינגים ספציפית ללגי וויקס,
גאו-פיזיסט שהסטימטו את הרזירות גבוהות להיות הרבה יותר,
וכן מהמנהל של ההסטמנות וההנחה של רזירות גבוהות גבוהות גבוהות.
אבל אומנם עכשיו הברד מסתובבר כמעט אקסקלוסית של רזירות גבוהות גבוהות,
הוא היה, בעצם, מתחיל בפרויקט גבוה יותר יפה-החיים,
פרויקט גבוהה,
מנסה להתפתח ולהתקיים את המדינה,
שכמו כן הוגניקה,
היה מאוד פופולר כמעט כשעה לפני חודש,
נמצא בפני חברה ומדינת ישראל,
ועוד עומד עכשיו, בנוגע אחר נמלים.
המדינה הזאת נקראה טכנוקרציה.
הלו,
אני הרמד פיטרסון,
וזו הפעם של הפרסמנות של טכנוקרציה וסיסטמת סוציאלית.
these programs are not intended to entertain or amuse you,
no are they meant to scare you.
We are making a new approach.
It is not political,
financial,
philosophical, legal, religious, or moral.
It is a technical logical approach.
טכנוקרציה is the scientific answer to America's social problems.
And טכנוקרציה is a new design for social operation that is based upon science.
It is the vehicle by which we can move into a new era for a better living.
טכנוקרציה build itself as a social movement,
a philosophy,
a scientific solution to political and economic problems,
and a new way of ordering the world.
But at base,
it is an idea for a new international economic order,
one to be designed and managed down to the most minute detail by a select view,
the Technוקרטs.
טכנוקרציה was defined
very succinctly in 1938 by their own publication,
the Technוקרט מגזין,
and they call it the system of scientific engineering of,
you know, society.
They saw themselves as a merger between hard science
and social science,
which really is an oxימור,
social science is not really a science,
in my opinion.
But they really believed that. So they believed that they could take their scientific method that they used in the hard sciences and apply it to society.
They also believed that they were the day of day alone,
they were the only ones that could run society correctly.
As a result of technology,
having come in and changed the fabric of society,
they hated politicians,
they hated the establishment,
the organization of society the way it was,
because it was not efficient,
it was not,
you know,
conservation based, if you will,
to conserve resources.
And so they just kind of took it upon them themselves to define an economic model that would replace capitalism in free enterprise,
and that's exactly what it was, replacement
economic system.
רואים על הנרי סנסמון's call for a scientifically-organized socialist system,
the positiveism and secular humanism of הגוסט קומט
and the principles of scientific management,
פרפאונדת by Frederick Taylor,
the Technocratic movement emerged from the same environment of progressivism,
positiveism and social darwinism that birth heוגניקס.
Just as the heוגנסיסטס believe the human race could be improved through selective breeding,
controlled and administered by a small group of scientists and their billionaire backers,
so too did the Technוקרטס believe that they could improve the social and
economic conditions of humanity by controlling and administering society.
happily enough for the אויילוגארקס,
the Technוקרטס would improve the world by replacing money with energy certificates.
led by the eccentric revolutionary economist and sociologist
Thורסטין ובלן,
the Technוקרטס that formed around ובלן's new school for social research and technical
alliance attracted both engineers and serious researchers like King Hubbard and Buckminster Fuller,
and fellow eccentricities like Howard סקוט.
סקוט,
a mysterious man of uncertain background,
established himself in New York City at the end of World War I,
and came to be seen as a בוהמיאן engineer.
In 1920 he went to work for the וובליז as a research director,
and the following year he found at the technical alliance,
a group of engineers and scientists centered around Columbia University,
who,
as a forerunner to the Technocracy movement,
advocated for a society run by scientists and engineers.
In 1932,
the charismatic and well-spoken Scott managed to attach himself to וולטר ראודנשטרוק,
a professor at Columbia and the founder of the University's Department of Industrial Engineering.
With a common interest in Technocracy,
the two became friends and allies.
It was through ראודנשטרוק that Scott was able to approach the President of Columbia,
ניקולס מורי בוטלר,
for permission to use the University's facilities.
בוטלר,
always on the lookout for the cutting edge of the progressivism,
was swayed by the Technocratic ideas,
and soon Scott's Committee on Technocracy was operating out of the basement of Hamilton Hall.
When Butler let word slip about the next big idea being cooked up in the basement of his university,
Technocracy became a sensation.
It was loaded in the press,
Scott became a saw-to-feel,
and there was even a dance named after the movement.
It was at Columbia that Scott met King Hubbard,
and the two,
an unlikely pair of serious-minded researcher and eccentric revolutionary,
immediately hit it off.
their stint together at Columbia was about to come to an abrupt end,
but the ressociation would last for decades and helped give birth to ideas that would eventually transform the world.
As it turned out, one of the promoters of technology,
howard סקוט,
turned out to be a fraud. He was kind of the main spokesman for the movement and he pumped up his resume,
כמו כל כך הרבה אנשים עכשיו,
אפשרות לדבר, הוא pumped it up
and basically just lied about his past,
his past�עת education.
They all assumed he had a degree in some advanced engineering,
whatever, he knew all the buzzwords,
אבל
some sharp פרופורטר did some investigative research on him,
he said, I can't find where this guy graduated anywhere.
And when Columbia found out that the guy was a fraud,
they realized they didn't,
well,
but there's ego gone to the ball,
he said, man, these people have played me.
And so he kicked him all out,
just כבום,
drop kicked him right out of it,
גאה, מה בילים.
And they all left and scattered.
And the technocrats that were left at Columbia, which where there were several of them that were professors at Columbia at the time,
they just zipped their lips,
shut up, went back to work, figureded out, I want to keep my job, I'm just going to,
you know,
not ever mentioned technology again. It didn't mean they stopped believing,
but they didn't talk about it for a very very long time at Columbia.
Disgraced,
אביקטד מקולומביה,
and with the Committee on Technocracy disbanded almost as quickly as it had come together,
סקוט found himself at a personal low.
Penny listened with an old debt having caught up to him.
He had only one person he could rely on.
M. King Hubרט.
Hubרט let סקוט live in his Greenwich Village Apartment and paid out of his
own pocket to file the articles of incorporation for Technocracy Inc,
a new membership organization that would carry on the principles of Technocracy.
The first step, of course,
was to define precisely what those principles were.
Hubbard got to work pending the Technocracy study course,
the Bible of the Technocracy movement.
In it,
Hubbard laid out the vision of an abundance of physical wealth on a continental scale for the use of all continental citizens,
which, he warned,
can only be accomplished by a continental technological control,
a governance of function,
a tech-nate.
The Technocratic system was to be structured around a new monetary paradigm,
one based not on dollars and cents,
but energy certificates,
representing the nation's net energy expenditure.
These certificates would be denominated in jewels and issued based on a net energy budget
deemed appropriate by the Technocratic state's governing scientists.
Citizens would be issued an equal share of the nation's certificates and make
their purchases with them,
and the information about these purchases would be relayed back to the central planning body for analysis.
In this method,
the Technocracy could,
in the words of one proponent,
create a thermodynamically balanced load of production and consumption,
thereby doing away with unemployment, debt and social injustice.
In the Technocracy study course,
Hubbard,
כמו טכנוקרט,
laid out the exact conditions that would need to be met for this vision to come to pass.
According to him,
Technocracy would require
all energy usage and all consumer spending throughout the nation to be calculated and registered on a continuous and instantaneous basis.
A 24-7 inventory of all production and consumption.
A complete registry of all products available for sale,
where they were produced,
how much energy was expanded in their production and where and when they were sold.
And finally,
a specific registration of the consumption of each individual,
plus a record and description of the individual.
Hubbard's vision was not just that of a totalitarian society in which
every detail of every interaction was recorded and reported to a central authority,
but for the 1930s,
the concept of continuously and instantaneously updated registries של כל טובות
and the אקונות.
The אמריקאים האחרונות היו לא רק אודיישות,
אבל בורדר-לין ארצות.
Nevertheless,
ספורים בגלל הגבוהה הראשונה,
האמריקנים היו יכולים לקרוא כלום איזה איזה איזה איזה סיסטמנטייה הזאת,
שהייתה כל כך ברור להם,
לא כל כך ברור.
טכנוקרטיה אינק עשתה את השלושות,
ספורים אליהם של מ-10,000 אחרות בנקודת,
אבל סקוטס אקצנטריק וווייז,
קמפלגים חבריונות לסלוט אותם במדינות ומות
רמבלים רדיו אדרסות,
אלא הגיעו לרצות הרבה,
ולחלות רגעי הרבה.
הבריט לא כל כך הרבה קונספטות של טכנוקרטיה,
אבל כשהוא נכנס בשל כמדינות,
הוא נתן להם במידה של טכנוקרטיה אינק
והוא לא מבין לרוברט ראשונה של האורגניזציה.
הטכנוקרטיה הכניסת את ההוכחלות של משרד ומשמעותית,
אחד שבו האנרגיה היא המחקרות הפונדמנטית של מספרות,
וכל קונסומציה ופרודקשת מסתכלות,
סנטרל.
טכנוגרסיטה אינק עכשיו נמצאה עד היום,
אבל המדבר והחשבות של הטכנוגרסים יש לייקוגניקה מתמורפיסט.
וגם לייקוגניקה,
המהלך יכול להיות המסגרת,
אבל האידיאה עומדת על ידי החולים של האויל הגארקס.
אם אתם חייבים במצב הרחב גדול אם אתם יכולים לקצת כסף מזה.
זה יכול להיות שכאשר המדבר יציגויות אמורות קרבונות אנשי חזרה,
נעשו בחצי החלטה,
כל אחד מהארץ' יציג לעשות קרבונות קרבונות.
כמו כסף מוסר,
ההצעה של ספרמרקט יציגויות כל הזמן שבוכרו אנחנו נמצאים אנשי חזרה לא נמצאים. למשל,
מתעסקים על הפליטה של חזרה אלקטריטית בנהל.
או ללכת איזשהו איזשהו איזשהו איזשהו פליטה של פטרופייה,
או אפילו לקבל פטרופייה או קר בנפול קורס.
כמה פעמים אחרונות יכולים להיות סולדים ללכת אסנציאל בנק,
אתם עומדים עכשיו,
ולאנשים שצריכים יותר,
כמו מוטריס,
שתשתמשו את העלוקציות שלהם,
יכולים לעלות על הטופ-אפ.
Carbon Rationing
קרוויזמה קרוויזמה קרוויזמה תעשייה קפ-און-טרד.
כמו שהטכנוקרטים של
רציונות פרקודת גורלית היא לא אפרוציה גורלית.
היא קוראת,
כן, מנצחים
גורלית דיוקסידים.
ואני אומר למדינת האספורטיביה,
שבמהלך
לא מאמינה בשלטון המקוות,
הם לא מאמינה בשלטון המקוות.
אני אומר להם כמה שנים
שזה לא נכון.
In my judgment, there is a,
the science is true, the science is
unequvokely true and that there is a price to carbon in their future.
I said this a couple of months ago, there is a price to carbon in their future.
But I believe that the cap and trade approach is the essential first step,
partly because it is the only basis upon which we can envision a truly global agreement, because it's
very difficult to imagine a harmonized global tax.
A carbon tax, or any other way of putting a carbon price,
is actually, from an economic point of view,
the most effective and efficient way to do this, OK?
You can regulate and you can do, you know, all kinds of things.
But the nothing is a strong market signal to the private sector as a carbon price. Whether that be a carbon tax, or whether it be a cap and trade, which is what California is doing, or any of the other measures that ultimately give you a carbon price.
But that is the simplest, cleanest, most powerful, most powerful signal.
So if that's possible,
I'm with you.
This measures are sold to the public as a way of penalizing the big oil interests that have spent the last century
on monopolizing the world's key resources and plundering the earth in the pursuit of profit.
What they do not understand,
because it has been deliberately obscured,
is that it is these very interests that have been instrumental in creating these schemes in the first place.
It's my understanding that back in 1997,
when you were Vice President,
Enrondes, CEO,
Keng לי,
was involved in discussions with you at the White House about helping to develop this type of policy, this trading scheme.
And is that accurate? Is it not accurate? It's been reported.
I don't know,
but I met with Keng לי, as lots of people did before anyone knew he was a... Right. And clearly,
you can see why so many of us are concerned about this type of cap
trade trade trade trade trade.
experse תקציבות.
experse תקציבות.
I לא יודעים אותם כך, גולן קניבוי.
אבל אתה יודעים אותם ככה, אבל אתה יודעים אותם ככה לברך להבטיח את החלטה הזאת.